comes from the Greekwords "PHILOS" means LOVE and "SOPHIA" means WISDOM.
SENSE OF WONDER
was the first explained by the Greek Philosopher PLATO
Sense of Doubt
was first traced by the 15th-century French philosopher Rene Descartes.
He was notable for refusing or questioning established ideas.
Sense of Experience
was first recommended by the 20th-century Swiss-German philosopher
Karl Jaspers.
Karl Jaspers
He believed that man is often confronted by experience which challenges his ideas and frameworks
Love of Wisdom
first done by the ancient Greek Philosophers, and most especially the foremost philosopher, SOCRATES.
Acquiring knowledge, but it needs to question, clarify, prove and to discuss toward reaching the peak.
SOCRATES
"The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living."
3 characteristic of Philosophy
analysis of frameworks
an examination of knowledge
as a discipline.
A framework
defined as a way of thinking about the world and is composed of the views and beliefs of a person.
As an examination of knowledge
This ways deals with questioning and examining the established ideas and concepts that needed to prove the correctness and truthfulness
Through Philosophy
a person maybe able to understand that not all the established ideas and knowledge are correct.
Philosophy
DISTINCT AREA OF KNOWLEDGE with its own goals, concerns, and ways of doing things.
Aesthetic
deals with beauty and what makes things beautiful.
Logic
deals with correct reasoning;
Epistemology
discusses the nature of knowledge and knowing
Ethics
refers to moral questions of justice, power and the rights and obligations of citizens.
Metaphysics
deals with questions regarding reality and existence.
Correspondence theories of truth
a belief is true if and only if it corresponds with something that exist in this world.
Coherence theories of truth
a belief is true if it coheres with a body of other statements that we take to be true.
Pragmatic theories of truth
truth is what useful to believe and has practical value in our lives.
It is something that truth is what works.
Truth
related to science because it is the field that delivers knowledge about the natural world
Objective Truth
the point to descriptions of “states of Affairs” which remain true regardless of who is viewing them.
Social domain
truth is analogous with a generalagreement or consensus on what is right as opposed to what is wrong.
Truth is tested against their acceptability to a particular group in a particular time in history.
Personal domain
where truth is analogous with sincerity.
Truths are tested against the consistency and authenticity of the person who claims it.
Objective domain
is a scientific truth that pertains to the naturalworld that maintains a relative independence from the perspective and attitude of human beings that perceive them.
Truths are tested against empirical evidence.
Richard Rorty
offers a simple way of defining truth it can be understood as what has passed “procedures of justification,”
Justification
the process of proving the truth or validity of a statement.
Opinions
statements of judgement that needfurtherjustification
a statement of judgement of a person about something in the world.
Argument
a group of statements that serve to support a conclusion.
Fallacies
a group of statements that appear to be arguments but
fail to support the conclusion.
ArgumentumadHominem
rejected because of the person’s personalbackground his/her history, nationality, race, socio-economic status, family, associations religion and other circumstances.
Argumentum adBaculum
issuing threats to their opponents.
Argumentum adMisericordiam
also called an appealtoemotion.
manipulating their emotions.
Argumentum adPopulum
favorite marketing strategy by advertising agencies
Deductive arguments
offered to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion.
Non - Deductive arguments
offered to provide probable support for its conclusion but not conclusive.
Premises
a true or false statement that helps form the body of an argument, which logically leads to a true or false conclusion.
Valid Argument
argument whose premises guarantee the truth of the conclusion
Sound Argument
valid deductive argument whose premises are all true
Counter example
a scenario in which the premises of the argument are true while the conclusion is clearly false