strict liability -- no need to prove intent, or negligence, or a mistake
FDACA found to be a "public welfare" statute
purpose: prevent egregious social harm
therefore, a person "in charge" willingly, like a CEO of a pharmacy chain, is liable for illegal practices, harm, consequences that occur in any of the company's locations
were liable whether they had been in the "offending" facility or never had
even if the boss "didn't know what was going on"
the boss SHOULD have known and is liable