risk management

Cards (17)

  • malpractice
    • should you elect to work for an employer who offers to cover malpractice insurance of some sort?
    • investigate it
    • understand it
    • what protections it offers
    • consider basic protection
    • if you don't have it provided, investigate a provider and obtain malpractice insurance
  • what will you do?
    • avoid the risk?
    • by not providing the service or outsourcing risk to an insurer?
    • "hold" the risk?
    • by paying out of your pocket
    • transfer the risk?
    • via an agreement (contract) w/ customer providing their own insurance or insure yourself via proper policy
  • insurance basics
    • at a minimum, you should look at these protections:
    • professional liability
    • general liability
    • "trailing protection"
  • professional liability
    • offers protection from claims that allege
    • errors
    • omissions
    • breach of duty
    • misleading statements
    • if offer protection, NOT a guarantee that you will be unscathed
  • general liability
    • covers items such as:
    • slander, libel
    • defamation
    • injury caused by a product
    • injury from general operation of a pharmacy business
  • umbrella policy
    • what is umbrella insurance?
    • personal umbrella insurance is a type of insurance designed to add extra liability coverage over and above another insurance policy
  • trailing insurance
    • liability and umbrella might be enough
    • talk to an insurance expert when the time comes
    • generally, you want protection after you leave the practice of pharmacy
    • you'd probably have to "buy" this policy yourself
  • interviewing do's and don't's
    • avoid asking questions about:
    • religion
    • sexual orientation
    • height, weight
    • age
    • criminal record unless specifically job-related
    • mental health
  • interviewing
    • what are you allowed to do?
    • you can contact prior employers or references and ask
    • "would you hire this person?"
    • BUT you cannot explore why or why not, when they answer
  • liability
    • strict liability -- no need to prove intent, or negligence, or a mistake
    • FDACA found to be a "public welfare" statute
    • purpose: prevent egregious social harm
    • therefore, a person "in charge" willingly, like a CEO of a pharmacy chain, is liable for illegal practices, harm, consequences that occur in any of the company's locations
    • were liable whether they had been in the "offending" facility or never had
    • even if the boss "didn't know what was going on"
    • the boss SHOULD have known and is liable
  • vicarious liability
    • special relationship
    • such as employer - employee
    • be careful: some types of liability insurance don't cover "intentional wrongs" or "breach of contract"
  • bonus: possibly a final exam question
    • the state board of pharmacy has inspectors who are pharmacists. can an inspectors originate a board enforcement for a pharmacy infarction? such as letter of admonition or a citation or a fine?
    • yes, they can
  • board of pharmacy
    • the mission of Ca Board of Pharmacy is to protect the public
  • as a pharmacy manager
    • if a state board inspector shows up, you should:
    • invite them in
    • show them professional courtesy
    • you can ask to see identification
  • does an inspector need...
    • a reason to show up at your pharmacy?
    • no
    • a pre-notification to you of their time/day of arrival?
    • no
  • Eric Cropp Video Reference
    • the "boss" is responsible even if ignorant of the proceedings
    • they "should have known"
  • advanced practice pharmacy
    • includes the expanded scope of practice to diagnose in certain situations w/ collaboration w/ a doctor