Human rights abuse carries the risk of unfair labelling and used for social control, e.g. drapetomania (black slaves running away) were a way to control enslaved people and avoid debate
Deviation from social norms is necessary for diagnosing conditions such as anti-social personality disorder, where the societal norm is a defining factor
Absence of signs of mental health used to judge abnormality
Failure to meet (Jahoda's) criteria − inaccurate perception of reality; problems with self-actualisation; inability to cope with stress; negative attitude towards self; lack of autonomy/independence; poor environmental mastery, self actualisation
The more criteria someone fails to meet, the more abnormal they are
Criteria for deviation from ideal mental health are too demanding - most people would be judged abnormal based on this definition; many aspects not being met is a normal part of life
Deviation from ideal mental health criteria reflect Western cultural norms of psychological 'normality', e.g. self-actualisation (could be seen as self-indulgent/selfish) and independence (drawing upon and communicating support, could be seen as mentally healthy instead)
Abnormality judged as inability to deal with the demands of everyday living e.g. not being able to hold down a job, maintain relationships or maintain basic standards of nutrition and hygiene
Behaviour is maladaptive, irrational, unpredictable or dangerous
Behaviour causes personal distress and distress to others
Failure to function adequately might not be linked to abnormality but to other factors, e.g. failure to keep a job may be due to the economic situation not to psychopathology
Failure to function adequately is context dependent; not eating can be seen as failing to function adequately but prisoners on hunger strikes making a protest can be seen in a different light
Development of phobia through classical conditioning – association of fear/anxiety with neutral stimulus to produce conditioned response; assumes experience of traumatic event; generalisation of fear to other similar objects; one trial learning
Maintenance of fear through operant conditioning – avoidance of phobic object/situation is negatively reinforcing; relief as reward/primary reinforcer
Many people with phobias cannot identify incident/trauma e.g. snake conditioning is not the only way fears are acquired, some phobias have an evolutionary aspect − a biological preparedness
The two-process model is a reductionist approach, other factors such as cognitive irrational beliefs/catastrophising, psychodynamic explanation (unconscious conflict, ego displace onto something external e.g. Little Hans), diathesis-stress may also play a role
Anxiety hierarchy created by client and therapist designing a list or hierarchy of frightening/ stressful events or objects
Relaxation training, e.g. breathing techniques, imagery or meditation. It is impossible to be afraid and relaxed and afraid at the same time, one emotion prevents the other→ reciprocal inhibition
Gradual exposure to the anxiety hierarchy
At each stage, if the client becomes upset they can return to an earlier stage and regain their relaxed state
Exposure: to phobic stimulus, a new response is learned→ e.g. relaxation =counterconditioning
Systematic Desensitisation is effective, Gilroy (2003) followed up 42 people with a spider phobia in 3 45min sessions. At both 3 and 33months the SD group were less fearful