Lombroso believed that criminals inherited their criminality genetically and that they were born criminal
Lombroso's theory of criminality is in favour of nature
Lombroso argues that criminals can be identified by certain atavistic features
Atavistic feature
Features that are not present in modern humans but are present in some ancestral species
Examples of atavistic features:
Large or forward projection of the jaw
High cheekbones
Flattened or upturned nose
Low, sloping forehead
Long arms, relative to limbs
Large ears
Large chin and lips
Lombroso argued that criminals are separate species to humans
Lombroso believed that criminals were from an earlier stage of human development that manifested in them committing more crimes
Lombroso believed that the criminals species is:
Pre-social
Impulse driven
Insensitive to pain (often had tattoos)
Lombroso examined 383 dead and 3839 living criminals
Lombroso's research showed that 40% of criminal acts could be accounted for by atavistic features
Lombroso believed that the type of crime committed by a criminal could be determined by their features too
Lombroso believed that a murderer would have curly hair and bloodshot eyes
Lombroso believed that sex offenders would have thick lips and protruding ears
Lombroso suggested that factors such as a person's use of criminal slang, insensitivity to pain, and unemployment could be used to predict criminal behaviour
Lombroso's theory was published in L'uomo Delinquente [The Criminal Man] in (2006)
Atavistic feature - Features that are not present in modern humans but are present in some ancestral species
Atavistic features
Features that are not present in modern humans but are present in some ancestral species