population of isolated dwellings & where does it come in the settlement hierarchy?
1-2 people living there & it is at the very bottom of the hierarchy, below a hamlet
population of a hamlet & where does it come in the settlement hierarchy?
population of 100 or less, and is placed just above isolated dwellings in the hierarchy
population of a village & where does it come in the settlement hierarchy?
population of 100-1000, and is placed just above hamlets in the hierarchy
population of a small town & where does it come in the settlement hierarchy?
population of 1000-20,000 and is placed above the villages in the hierarchy
population of a large town & where does it come in the settlement hierarchy?
population of 20,000-100,000 and is placed above the small towns in the hierarchy
population of a city & where does it come in the settlement hierarchy?
population of 100,000-300,000 and is placed above the large towns in the hierarchy
population of a large city & where does it come in the settlement hierarchy?
population of 300,000-1 million, and is placed above the cities in the hierarchy
population of a metropolis/conurbation & where does it come in the settlement hierarchy?
population of 1-10 million, and is placed above the large cities in the hierarchy
what does a settlement hierarchy show?
it shows the different settlements in order of population size & surface area.higher up the hierarchypopulation size & surface areaincreases vice versa
weaknesses of the Burgess Model
It assumes that cities grow in a concentric pattern, with the oldest area at the centre & newer developments radiating outwards.
However, it doesn't account for factors like modern urban planning/transportation advancements
And also the influence of socioeconomic factors on urban development
weaknesses of the Bid-rent theory
On the other hand (compared to the burgess model), focuses on how land value decreases as distance from the city centre increases.
It oversimplifies the relationship between land value & distance,
not considering factors like zoning laws & infrastructure
& even local amenities that may also affect land value.
examples of urban development not following the burgess model
(1) The sector model proposed by Homer Hoyt:
In this model, cities develop in sectors along transportation routes, such as highways/rivers,
rather than concentric rings.
This type of urban development is common in many cities where growth is influenced by geographical features & transportation corridors,
deviating from the concentric patterndescribed in the burgess model.
why fluctuations in population density in HIC CBD occured over time.
CBD:
Initially experienced an increase in population density as it became a hub for commercial activities, businesses & attracting more people to work/live in the area.
However, as cities grow & urban sprawl takes place, CBD may experience a decrease in residential population density, as more people choose to live in the suburbs for a quieter lifestyle.
why fluctuations in population density in inner city residential zones occured over time.
Inner city residential zone:
May see an increase in population density initially due to the proximity to the CBD & amenities,
but as the city expands/develop, some residents may move to the suburbs for more space & better quality life -> decrease in population density in these areas.