When an individual carries out the orders of an authority figure and acts as their 'agent', with little personal responsibility and reduced moral strain for their actions
Autonomous state
When a person is acting independently
Shifting from autonomy to 'agency'
Referred to as the 'agentic shift'
In Milgram's original experiment, 65% of participants administered the full 450 volts and were arguably in an agentic state
In a variation of Milgram's experiment with an additional confederate administering the electric shocks, the percentage of participants who administered the full 450 volts rose dramatically, from 65% to 92.5%
Legitimacy of authority
Participants were recognising the legitimate authority of the researcher
In Milgram's original research at Yale University, the percentage of participants administering the full 450 volts was 65%
When the experiment was replicated in a rundown building in Bridgeport, Connecticut, obedience levels dropped to 47.5%
Proximity
How close you are to someone or something
In Milgram's experiment, proximity worked on numerous levels: how close the teacher was to the learner, and how close the teacher was to the experimenter
Location
Where the experiment takes place
Uniform
What the authority figure is wearing
Agentic state
When someone sees themselves as an agent of the authority figure, carrying out their orders, rather than taking personal responsibility
In Milgram's original study, the percentage of participants administering the full 450 volts was 65%
Location and legitimate authority
When the experiment took place in a rundown building, the percentage of participants administering the full 450 volts dropped to 47.5%
Proximity (learner)
When the teacher and learner were in the same room, the percentage of participants administering the full 450 volts dropped to 40%
Proximity (authority figure)
When the experimenter gave instructions over the phone, the percentage of participants administering the full 450 volts dropped to 20.5%
Uniform and legitimate authority
When the experimenter was replaced by another 'participant' in ordinary clothes, the percentage of participants administering the full 450 volts dropped to 20%
Research supports the role of the agentic state in explaining Milgram's high obedience rates
There are differences in the degree to which authority figures are seen and accepted as legitimate in some cultures
Research supports the role of the situational variable of uniform affecting obedience rates
Milgram's methodological approach to systematically changing one variable at a time can be praised for having high reliability
Milgram's research acknowledges the role of environmental forces in the form of situational factors which determine human behaviour such as obedience to unjust orders
Explanations of obedience adopt a nomothetic approach, as they attempt to provide general principles relating to human behaviour
Milgram only used male participants in his original sample, showing a beta bias
The fact that Milgram only used male participants can be criticised as being androcentric, since the results cannot be generalised to females
Authoritarian personality
Characterized by high levels of obedience and an authoritarian personality
Obedient participants in Milgram's study
Scored higher on the F-scale compared to disobedient participants
Obedient participants in Milgram's study
Were less close to their fathers during childhood and admired the experimenter
Obedient participants in Milgram's original research displayed more characteristics of the authoritarian personality
Authoritarian personality
Individual differences that contribute to its development
Less-educated people
More likely to display authoritarian personality characteristics
It is not authoritarian personalitycharacteristics alone that lead to obedience, but levels of education
The F-scale may suffer from response bias or social desirability, where participants provide answers that are socially acceptable
The F-scale may represent a political bias, as it only measures extreme right-wing ideologies and ignores authoritarianism in left-wing politics
Adorno et al. came to believe that a high degree of authoritarianism was similar to suffering from a psychological disorder
Dispositional explanation
Uses a nomothetic approach to establish general laws of behaviour relating to authoritarian characteristics
Obedient behaviour is determined by our socialisation experiences and not a result of free will
Authoritarian personality
An inflexible viewpoint
Intolerance of others who are weak
Contemptuousness towards people of lower social status