physicalvariables - day of the week, testing room, noise and distractions
physical variables - aspects of the testing conditions that can be controlled
elimination - make sure that an extraneous variable does not affects an experiment, removal of extraneous variable
constancy of conditions - we keep all aspects of the treatment conditions as nearly similar as possible, try to make sure that it stays the same in all treatment conditions
physical variables that can be kept constant with a little effort:
time of testing
testing location
mechanical procedures
balancing - distributing the effects of an extraneous variable across the different treatment conditions of the experiment
ways in controlling physical variables
elimination
constancy
balancing
balancing - if we cannot test all subjects at the same time of the day, we arrange things so that we test equal numbers of treatment
things are fine - as long as there is no systematic change in an extraneous variable
precautions to set up a reasonably good experiment:
internal validity - do not sacrifice this for external validity
social variables - qualities of relationships between subjects and experimenters that can influence results
demand characteristics - demand that people behave in a particular way
demand characteristics - they want to conform to what they think is the proper role of a subjects
single-blind experiment - subjects do not know which treatment they are getting
single-blind experiment - we can disclose some but not all information about the experiment to subjects, disclose what is going to happen to them in the experiment, keep them fully informed about the purpose of the study
placebo effect - researchers know that if you give a person any pill, the person is apt to say that the pill helped
placebo - pill, injection or other treatment that contains none of the actual medications
cover story - plausible but false explanation for the procedures used in the study
cover story - disguise the actual research hypothesis so that subjects will not guess what it is
controlling demand characteristics:
single-blind experiment
cover story
experimenter bias - the experimenter does something that creates confounding in the experiment
rosenthal effect - experimenters might also treat subjects differently depending on what they expect from them, they might give more time to subjects who have gone through a particular treatment
pygmalion effect - other term for rosenthal effect
rosenthal effect - can be another source of confounding in an experiment
double-blind experiment - subjects do not know which treatment they are receiving and the experimenter does not know either
double-blind experiment - if the experimenter does not know which treatment the subject is getting, he or she cannot bias the responses in any systematic way
personality variables - personal characteristics that an experimenter brings to the experimental setting
context variables - come about from procedures created by the environment or context of the research setting