Guidance of others in the pursuit of individual and collective goals, often by directing, coordinating, motivating, supporting, and unifying their efforts; also, the ability to lead others
Leaders
Influence others
People who use domination and intimidation to influence others—whether they are kings, presidents, bosses, or managers—maybe powerful, but they are not necessarily leaders
Leadership
An adaptive, goal-seeking process, for it organizes and motivates group members' attempts to attain personal and group goals
Leadership
A cooperative, reciprocal relationship
What do leaders do?
Task leadership (focuses on the group's work and its goals)
Relationship leadership (focuses on the interpersonal relations within the group)
Leader's Traits
Assertiveness
Authenticity
Birth Order
Character Strengths
Dominance
FFMP
Gender Identity
Narcissism
Self-efficacy
Self-monitoring
Social Motivation
The Dark Triad
Machiavellianism: Machiavellians endorse using manipulative tactics in dealing with other people and espouse a cynical view of human nature
Leader's Look
They are often taller, healthier, and older than the average group member
Leadership is not limited to any particular cultural, ethnic, or racial group, for the role of leader is firmly embedded in different traditions
Types of Leadership
Authoritarian or Autocratic Leader (leader took no input from the members in making decisions)
Democratic Leader (made certain that all activities were first discussed by the entire group)
Laissez-faire Leader (rarely intervened in the group activities)
Followership Theory
Conformist (are active and energized, but they are devoted to the leader)
Passive (follow the lead of others, but without great enthusiasm or commitment)
Pragmatic (they are not clearly active, passive, conforming, or independent, but make up the group's basic, and essential, workforce)
Alienated (they often think of themselves as the rightful leader of the group and refuse to invest in the group or its activities until they are accorded their rightful position)
Exemplary (actively engaged in the group, but they do not simply do what they are told)
Types of Leadership
Transactional Leadership
Transformational Leadership
Group Influence
When we are alone we can act as best suits our own desires and motivations, but when in groups we are interdependent
Social Influence
Interpersonal processes that change people's thoughts, feelings, or actions
Majority Influence: Power of the Many
Compliance (Members privately disagree with the group but they publicly express an opinion that matches the opinion expressed by the majority of the group)
Conversion (Members change their position on the issue because they think the group is correct; they personally accept the group's position as their own)
Congruence (Members agree with the group from the outset, so they are not responding to the group's influence when they express their position publicly)
Types of Nonconformity
Independence (Members disagree by publicly expressing ideas, beliefs, and judgments that are consistent with their personal standards)
Anticonformity (Express ideas or take actions that are the opposite of whatever the group favors)
Strategic Anticonformity (Members take a position that opposes that endorsed by the majority of the members publicly, even though privately they agree with the majority)
Conversion Theory
Maintains that disagreement within the group results in conflict and that the group members—motivated to reduce that conflict—change others and also change themselves
Minority Influence: Power of the Few
Validation (Direct, immediate, temporary)
Comparison (Indirect, delayed, durable)
Six Bases of Power
Reward power (promise of positive, desirable incentives)
Coercive power (threat of negative, undesirable consequences)
Legitimate power (have the right to require the requested behavior)
Referent power (relationship based, respect, attraction)
Expert power (perceived knowledge, skills, abilities)
Informational power (capacity to reason, explain, inform)
Power Tactics
Specific strategies used to influence others, usually to gain a particular objective or advantage
Hard and Soft Tactics
Hard tactics are more coercive than soft tactics, often described as harsh, forcing, or direct, but they are not necessarily more powerful than soft tactics
Direct, Rational and Indirect, Nonrational Tactics
Rational tactics emphasize reasoning, logic, and good judgment; bargaining and persuasion are examples
Unilateral tactics can be enacted without the cooperation of the target of influence, such as demands, evasion, and disengagement
Bilateral tactics include persuasion, discussion, and negotiation
Power increases activity levels
Prompting people to take action rather than remain passive
Power
Facilitates executive cognitive functions by enhancing attentional focus, decision-making, planning, and goal-selection
Powerful people
Tend to experience, and express, more positive emotions than those who are lower in power
Powerful individuals
Exhibit more intense and resilient goal-striving
Powerful people
Feel freer to express their ideas and resist conformity pressures that influence less powerful people
Powerful people
Are proactive, but in some cases their actions are risky, inappropriate, or unethical
Powerful people
May lead to unrealistically positive self-evaluation, and overestimations of interpersonal power
Powerful people
Often generate negative emotional reactions in their subordinates, particularly when there is disagreement and conflict in the group
Powerful people
Often misjudge, misunderstand, and even derogate their subordinates
Powerful people
Also tend to use their power to influence others even when a display of power is unnecessary
Powerful people
May treat others unfairly, particularly if they are more self-centered rather than focused on the overall good of the group