Psych: Offender Profiling

    Cards (27)

    • Offender profiling
      Creating a set of psychological characteristics based on evidence at a crime scene to help narrow down a suspect list
    • Top-down offender profiling

      Profile of offender exists and then it is applied to the crime scene details
    • Bottom-up offender profiling
      Starts with the details of the crime scene and builds up towards the profile
    • Data assimilation
      Step 1 : Collects the information from the crime scene
    • Crime scene classification
      Step 2: Decides whether the crime scene is organised or disorganised
    • Profile generation
      Step 4: Final profile is created
    • Crime scene reconstruction
      Step 3: The 'story' or 'sequence of events' in the crime is determined
    • Organised offender

      Will be intelligent, socially competent and use surgical precision
    • Disorganised offender
      Will be less intelligent, social inadequate and messy
    • Interviews with 36 serial killers

      Data the top down approach was based on
    • Investigative psychology

      The use of psychological theory and statistics to build up a profile
    • Interpersonal coherence
      Behaviour towards the victim in the crime scene matches behaviour towards the victim in the real world
    • Criminal consistency hypothesis
      Criminals are likely to commit similar behaviour in each of their crimes, thus meaning they will commit crimes
    • Spatial consistency
      Criminals are likely to commit crimes in areas they are comfortable/familiar with
    • Geographical profiling

      Use of crime locations to build up a profile
    • Circle theory
      David Canter's theory that collecting the locations of similar crimes you can determine where they live/work etc.
    • Marauders
      Commit crimes in their local areas
    • Commuters
      Travel to commit their crimes
    • Big crimes'
      The only crimes that the top down approach can really generalise to (e.g. murders, assault etc.)
    • Classification is too simple
      This is because most crimes have characteristics of both organised and disorganised in them, rarely definitively one or the other
    • The case of Rachel Nickell
      She was murdered in Wimbledon Common, and the use of bottom up profiling found the wrong person
    • Can be applied to all crimes
      A strength of the bottom up approach e.g. as all crimes have geographical data
    • FBI Behavioural Unit (1970s)

      The organisation that created the top-down approach to offender profiling
    • Copson et al.

      Found 82% of police officers liked the top-down approach and would use it again
    • Counter-argument to Copson et al.'s research

      However, just because police officers like using it doesn't mean that it is actually more successful
    • Three reasons why the top down approach has difficulty generalsing to many crimes
      It was based off a small sample (36) of very specific criminals (serial killers) from one culture (the US)
    • This makes the bottom up approach more objective and scientific than the top down approach

      It's use of statistics and computer models to elp build up profiles
    See similar decks