A UK Based model developed by Dr. Eric Sheppard (Psychologist) while working for the Home Office (1990's) based on his "conversation management" approach. The model uses 5 steps; Planning; Engage and Explain; Account; Closure; and Evaluate
Interview method to determine truthful cues, developed with/alongside existing methods and the law, uses confrontation, coercion, psychological manipulation (minimization), and other tactics to obtain a confession, still in use across North America
Adopted as the national framework, interviewers are to be objective fact finders, open-minded, not to use behavioral cues to detect deception, and no tricks, coercion, or manipulation, introduced into Canada in 2016 (RCMP)
Prior to the interview investigators must familiarize themselves with: Dates / times, Locations, People's names, A suspect's background if applicable, Key topics, and Goals
A non-accusatory fact-finding interview (And, a Behavioral Analysis Interview), designed to help detect deception, free-flowing, semi structured, limited note taking (inhibiting flow), neutral and objective, controlled environment (optional)
Made to clearly identify the issue under investigation, to establish the investigators objectivity concerning the suspect's truthfulness or deception, and to persuade the suspect that if he lies his deception will be detected
An accusatory, persuasive, process designed to get a confession, there are 9 steps: Direct Positive Confrontation, Theme development, Handling denials, Overcoming objections, Procurement of the subject's attention, Handling subject's passive mood, Presenting an alternative question, Developing the details of the admission, Converting a verbal confession into a written or recorded document
Reid Technique - Presenting an alternative question
1. The alternative consists of a question in which the Sub. is offered two incriminating choices concerning some aspect of the crime - based on an assumption of guilt
2. The alternative should contrast an undesirable action with a desirable action and be followed by a supporting statement
3. All alternative questions are phrased so that they just need to nod
1. Engage - Provide an introduction appropriate to the type of incident interviewees involvement in the investigation (W, V, or S). Identify and take interest in the subject's needs (welfare – food, water, etc.)
2. Explain - The IR outlines the purpose of the interview explaining how the interview will proceed (Structure) and address any concerns the subject has. Any necessary caution(s) is given (Charter-Proof). Understanding must be confirmed
1. The Conversation Management (CM) method is meant for dealing with non-cooperative subjects
2. The PEACE model expects an IR to ignore a lack of cooperation
3. The IR should focus solely on the questions they are asking of the subject
4. Continued obstructive behavior, or lack of interest results in the IR initiating the D.E.A.L. Method (Description, Explanation, Action required, Likely consequences)
1. All involved parties should understand what happened during the interview
2. Give the interviewee an opportunity to add to, or clarify, what they already said
3. Identify the procedure/What comes next and answer questions
4. The IR needs to confirm all planned goals(themes) themes were covered; If not, the IR can go back to the account phase, ask more questions, or expand an already provided answers
5. Closure is as important as any other phase, and as such must not be rushed