EWT

Cards (23)

  • Eyewitness Testimony
    remembering details of events and crimes observed
  • Misleading Information
    incorrect info given to the eyewitness after the event:
    • leading questions
    • post-event discussion
  • Leading Questions Research:
    Loftus and Palmer
    • 45 participants watch a car accident video and answer a questionnaire
    • "How fast were the cars going when they - each other?"
    • 5 groups with different verbs - hit, contacted, bumped, collided, smashed
  • Leading Questions finding
    Loftus and Palmer
    • mean speed calculated was highest with 'smashed' (40.5) than with 'contacted' (31.8)
    • leading questions changed the recall of the event
  • Why do Leading Questions affect EWT?
    Response Bias - wording influences the answer but doesn't affect the memory
    Substitution - question alters the memory of an event
  • Post-Event Discussion Research
    Gabbert et al:
    • participants in pairs viewed the same crime from different angles then discussed what they saw before completing a recall test
  • Post-Event Discussion Findings
    Found 71% of participants recalled aspects that they didn't see but were told in the discussion (0% for control group)
  • Why does PED affect EWT?
    Memory contamination - combine info with their own memories
    Memory conformity - go along with other witnesses to gain social approval or to be 'right'
  • Strength of misleading info
    The consequences of inaccurate EWT in the real world are serious so research has enabled the cognitive interview, which provides more accurate info
  • Weakness of misleading info
    Loftus and Palmer's study was in a lab and so doesn't show real-life situations.
    Yuille and Cutshall found that witnesses to a armed robbery gave accurate reports despite leading questions
  • Anxiety
    State of emotional and physical arousal
  • Negative effect of anxiety research
    Johnson and Scott
    • participants in a waiting room experienced one of two conditions
    • casual convo + man holding pen with greasy hands
    • heated argument + man holding knife with bloody hands
  • Negative effect of anxiety findings
    Participants were asked to choose the man from 50 photos
    • Casual + pen had 49% accuracy
    • Heated + knife had 33% accuracy
    • Led to development of 'weapon focus'
  • Positive effect of anxiety research
    Yuille and Cutshall
    • real-life shooting in Canada with 21 witnesses - 13 participated
    • interviwed 4-5 months after the shooting and compared with original police interviews
    • EWT determined by details recalled
    • Participants asked about stress levels during and after the shooting
  • Positive effect of anxiety findings
    Witnesses were very accurate and there was little change in the amount or accuracy recalled
    • those with the highest levels of stress were the most accurate (88% compared to 75% less stressed)
  • Strength of positive effect of anxiety
    Christianson and Hubinette found that direct witnesses to a bank robbery in Sweden were the most accurate recallers
  • Weakness of anxiety
    Studies have methodological issues as the researcher's couldn't control what happened to participants in the intervening time e.g. post-event discussion
  • Cognitive Interview
    Fisher and Geiselman recommeded that police use psychological insights to improve EWT accuracy
  • Techniques in Cognitive Interview:

    • report everything - all details without editing anything
    • reinstate the context - mentally recreated the environment of the incident
    • reverse the order - recalled in a different order - prevents dishonesty and expectations
    • change the perspective - asked to recall event from other people's point of view
  • Application of CI to psychology
    Retrieval failure - report everything, reinstate context relate to dependent forgetting
    Schema - reverse order , change perspective help disrupt schema
  • Enhanced Cognitive Interview (ECI)
    Fisher et al added elements that focus on social dynamics between interviewer and participant
    • reduce anxiety
    • speak slowly
    • open-ended questions
    • no distractions
    • establish rapport for more recall
  • Strength of CI
    A meta analysis of 55 studies showed that the ECI was better than a standard interview
  • Weakness of CI
    Kebbell and Wagstaff say the CI is time-consuming for police officers and requires special training to do it right