incorrect info given to the eyewitness after the event:
leadingquestions
post-eventdiscussion
Leading Questions Research:
Loftus and Palmer
45 participants watch a car accident video and answer a questionnaire
"How fast were the cars going when they - each other?"
5 groups with different verbs - hit, contacted, bumped, collided, smashed
Leading Questions finding
Loftus and Palmer
mean speed calculated was highest with 'smashed' (40.5) than with 'contacted' (31.8)
leading questions changed the recall of the event
Why do Leading Questions affect EWT?
ResponseBias - wording influences the answer but doesn't affect the memory
Substitution - question alters the memory of an event
Post-Event Discussion Research
Gabbert et al:
participants in pairs viewed the same crime from different angles then discussed what they saw before completing a recall test
Post-Event Discussion Findings
Found 71% of participants recalled aspects that they didn't see but were told in the discussion (0% for control group)
Why does PED affect EWT?
Memory contamination - combine info with their own memories
Memory conformity - go along with other witnesses to gain social approval or to be 'right'
Strength of misleading info
The consequences of inaccurate EWT in the real world are serious so research has enabled the cognitive interview, which provides more accurate info
Weakness of misleading info
Loftus and Palmer's study was in a lab and so doesn't show real-life situations.
Yuille and Cutshall found that witnesses to a armed robbery gave accurate reports despite leading questions
Anxiety
State of emotional and physical arousal
Negative effect of anxiety research
Johnson and Scott
participants in a waiting room experienced one of two conditions
casual convo + man holding pen with greasy hands
heated argument + man holding knife with bloody hands
Negative effect of anxiety findings
Participants were asked to choose the man from 50 photos
Casual + pen had 49% accuracy
Heated + knife had 33% accuracy
Led to development of 'weapon focus'
Positive effect of anxiety research
Yuille and Cutshall
real-life shooting in Canada with 21 witnesses - 13 participated
interviwed 4-5 months after the shooting and compared with original police interviews
EWT determined by details recalled
Participants asked about stress levels during and after the shooting
Positive effect of anxiety findings
Witnesses were very accurate and there was little change in the amount or accuracy recalled
those with the highest levels of stress were the most accurate (88% compared to 75% less stressed)
Strength of positive effect of anxiety
Christianson and Hubinette found that direct witnesses to a bank robbery in Sweden were the most accuraterecallers
Weakness of anxiety
Studies have methodological issues as the researcher's couldn't control what happened to participants in the intervening time e.g. post-event discussion
Cognitive Interview
Fisher and Geiselman recommeded that police use psychological insights to improve EWT accuracy
Techniques in Cognitive Interview:

reporteverything - all details without editing anything
reinstate the context - mentally recreated the environment of the incident
reverse the order - recalled in a different order - prevents dishonesty and expectations
change the perspective - asked to recall event from other people's pointofview