EWT

    Cards (23)

    • Eyewitness Testimony
      remembering details of events and crimes observed
    • Misleading Information
      incorrect info given to the eyewitness after the event:
      • leading questions
      • post-event discussion
    • Leading Questions Research:
      Loftus and Palmer
      • 45 participants watch a car accident video and answer a questionnaire
      • "How fast were the cars going when they - each other?"
      • 5 groups with different verbs - hit, contacted, bumped, collided, smashed
    • Leading Questions finding
      Loftus and Palmer
      • mean speed calculated was highest with 'smashed' (40.5) than with 'contacted' (31.8)
      • leading questions changed the recall of the event
    • Why do Leading Questions affect EWT?
      Response Bias - wording influences the answer but doesn't affect the memory
      Substitution - question alters the memory of an event
    • Post-Event Discussion Research
      Gabbert et al:
      • participants in pairs viewed the same crime from different angles then discussed what they saw before completing a recall test
    • Post-Event Discussion Findings
      Found 71% of participants recalled aspects that they didn't see but were told in the discussion (0% for control group)
    • Why does PED affect EWT?
      Memory contamination - combine info with their own memories
      Memory conformity - go along with other witnesses to gain social approval or to be 'right'
    • Strength of misleading info
      The consequences of inaccurate EWT in the real world are serious so research has enabled the cognitive interview, which provides more accurate info
    • Weakness of misleading info
      Loftus and Palmer's study was in a lab and so doesn't show real-life situations.
      Yuille and Cutshall found that witnesses to a armed robbery gave accurate reports despite leading questions
    • Anxiety
      State of emotional and physical arousal
    • Negative effect of anxiety research
      Johnson and Scott
      • participants in a waiting room experienced one of two conditions
      • casual convo + man holding pen with greasy hands
      • heated argument + man holding knife with bloody hands
    • Negative effect of anxiety findings
      Participants were asked to choose the man from 50 photos
      • Casual + pen had 49% accuracy
      • Heated + knife had 33% accuracy
      • Led to development of 'weapon focus'
    • Positive effect of anxiety research
      Yuille and Cutshall
      • real-life shooting in Canada with 21 witnesses - 13 participated
      • interviwed 4-5 months after the shooting and compared with original police interviews
      • EWT determined by details recalled
      • Participants asked about stress levels during and after the shooting
    • Positive effect of anxiety findings
      Witnesses were very accurate and there was little change in the amount or accuracy recalled
      • those with the highest levels of stress were the most accurate (88% compared to 75% less stressed)
    • Strength of positive effect of anxiety
      Christianson and Hubinette found that direct witnesses to a bank robbery in Sweden were the most accurate recallers
    • Weakness of anxiety
      Studies have methodological issues as the researcher's couldn't control what happened to participants in the intervening time e.g. post-event discussion
    • Cognitive Interview
      Fisher and Geiselman recommeded that police use psychological insights to improve EWT accuracy
    • Techniques in Cognitive Interview:

      • report everything - all details without editing anything
      • reinstate the context - mentally recreated the environment of the incident
      • reverse the order - recalled in a different order - prevents dishonesty and expectations
      • change the perspective - asked to recall event from other people's point of view
    • Application of CI to psychology
      Retrieval failure - report everything, reinstate context relate to dependent forgetting
      Schema - reverse order , change perspective help disrupt schema
    • Enhanced Cognitive Interview (ECI)
      Fisher et al added elements that focus on social dynamics between interviewer and participant
      • reduce anxiety
      • speak slowly
      • open-ended questions
      • no distractions
      • establish rapport for more recall
    • Strength of CI
      A meta analysis of 55 studies showed that the ECI was better than a standard interview
    • Weakness of CI
      Kebbell and Wagstaff say the CI is time-consuming for police officers and requires special training to do it right
    See similar decks