Information in the environment that is registered briefly
Encoding
Turning sensory information into a form that can be stored
Types of encoding
Acoustic encoding
Visual encoding
Semantic encoding
Output
Recalling information e.g. behavioural response
Multi Store Model of Memory (MSM)
Model developed by Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin in 1968 that identifies 3 different stores in our memory system: sensory register, short term memory, and long term memory
Sensory register/memory
Registers a lot of sensory information briefly
We do not pay attention to all of the information around us
Short term memory (STM)
Information that we pay attention to gets transferred here
Can be stored for 18-30 seconds
Capacity is 7+/-2
Older information is pushed out (displaced) if too much information
Can be stored longer if rehearsed
Long term memory (LTM)
Can hold information for up to a lifetime
Has a limitless capacity
Mainly semantic memories with meanings
Information can be retrieved but can also be lost through decay
Attention
Taking notice of an event or information
Rehearsal
Repeating information to increase the duration of a memory
Retrieval
Recalling a memory
Decay
Forgetting information in the long term memory as it has broken down
Displacement
Forgetting information in the short term memory due to incoming information
Capacity
The amount of information stored
Duration
The length of time information is stored
Strengths of the MSM
Has support from case studies of patients with brain damage
Gives a good structure of the short term memory for researchers to expand on
Case studies have shown we can have no STM but a LTM
Weaknesses of the MSM
Not all information is rehearsed and transferred into LTM, it can decay and displace
Reconstructive memory
Our memories are not exact copies but are influenced by our prior knowledge and expectations (schemas)
Schemas
Packets of knowledge about an event, person or place that influence how we perceive and remember
How schemas are formed
Personal experience
Stereotypes
Culture
How schemas influence memory
Omissions: leaving out unfamiliar, unpleasant or irrelevant details
Transformations: changing details to make them more rational
Familiarisation: changing unfamiliar details to align with our own schema
Rationalisation: adding details to give a reason for something that may not have originally fitted with a schema
Strengths of reconstructive memory theory
Real world application: helped police understand eyewitness testimony is unreliable
Useful: Bartlett's methods tested memory in realistic ways
Weaknesses of reconstructive memory theory
Not useful: Bartlett's data could be subjective
Not useful: Bartlett's procedures were not very scientific
Amnesia
A special type of forgetting affecting the long term memory, characterised by forgetting or memory loss, particularly after a brain injury
Retrograde amnesia
Being unable to recall information from before a brain injury
Anterograde amnesia
Being unable to recall information from after a brain injury
By rehearsing, we can store information in our short term memory
Peterson and Peterson (1959) experiment 1
1. Repeat out loud trigram (three consonants)
2. Count backwards in 3s from 400
3. Recall trigram when signalled
Peterson and Peterson (1959) experiment 2
Same tasks but participants given time to repeat the trigram before counting
Strengths of Peterson and Peterson (1959)
Reliability: fixed timings when counting backwards
Real world application: suggests revising in small chunks
Validity: used nonsense trigrams to control for personal meaning
Weaknesses of Peterson and Peterson (1959)
Validity: laboratory experiment in unnatural environment
Validity: used nonsense trigrams, not realistic
Generalisability: only used student participants
Validity: only recorded number of trigrams recalled, no other interpretations
Bartlett's 'War of the Ghosts' (1932)
1. Participants read the story twice
2. They then had to recall the story using serial reproduction and repeated reproduction
Schema theory
Also known as the 'War of Ghosts'
Procedure
1. Participants read the story of the WOG twice
2. They then had to recall the story using serial reproduction and repeated reproduction
Serial Reproduction
A technique where participants retell stories to each other to form a chain
Repeated Reproduction
Where participants retell a story over and over again
Serial reproduction
Retell it 15-30 mins later
Repeated reproduction
Write out the story 15 mins later, recall it after minutes, days, hours, months and years
Strengths of the War of the Ghosts study
Remembering a story is an everyday test of memory, giving the procedure ecological validity
The study was replicated and the same results were found using various studies, giving it reliability
Results were gathered using qualitative analysis, allowing the real nature of reconstructive memory to be understood through its meaning
Weaknesses of the War of the Ghosts study
The story was not familiar, illogical and contained strange words, which could be a reason why participants were unable to remember it, so it may not have been an accurate test of memory
Results were gathered using qualitative analysis, which is considered unscientific as Bartlett may have been biased towards his theory
Participants read the story at their own pace and recalled their version after different timed intervals, lacking controls and being unscientific, so those who took longer may have performed better