We can expose different entities to different experimental manipulations (a between-groups or independent design), or take a single group of entities and expose them to different experimental manipulations at different points in time (a repeated measures or within-subject design)
1. 2 samples of data are collected and the sample means calculated
2. If the samples come from the same population, then we expect their means to be roughly equal
3. We compare the difference between the sample means that we collected to the difference between the sample means that we would expect to obtain if there were no effect
4. If the difference between the samples we have collected is larger than we would expect based on the standard error then one of two things has happened
There was a statistically significant decrease in FOST scores from Time 1 (M = 40.17, SD = 5.16) to Time 2 (M = 37.5, SD = 5.15), t (29) = 5.39, p <.001 (two-tailed)
In a normal population you would expect the verbal IQ (VIQ) and the performance IQ (PIQ) of people with chronic illness to be similar. The population mean IQ is 100
Batool and Kausar (2015) hypothesised that there are likely to be significant changes in the pre- and post-diagnostic health-related behaviours of patients with hepatitis C. The sample was 100 patients diagnosed with hepatitis C. A questionnaire was used to assess these behaviours, in particular the researchers assessed medication adherence of the patients
Twenty-four people were involved in an experiment to determine whether background noise (music, slamming of doors, people making coffee, etc.) affects short-term memory (recall of words). Half of the sample were randomly allocated to the NOISE condition, and half to the NO NOISE condition. The participants in the NOISE condition tried to memorize a list of 20 words in two minutes, while listening to pre-recorded noise through earphones. The other participants wore earphones but heard no noise as they attempted to memorize the words