A key issue with historical psychological research, particularly concerning Jacobs, is the lack of standardisation and appreciation of scientific methods
The current laboratory experiment methodology produces highly reliable and valid data through controlling and so removing the effects of extraneous and confounding variables
The same is unlikely to be said of Jacobs, where confounding variables such as a noisy room or difficult word lists, may have had a greater influence on accuracy of recall, leading to unreliable results
The findings of Bahrick et al have high ecological validity because they can be easily generalised to real-life, due to the stimuli reflecting those which we would often try to learn and recall in our day to day lives: information with personal and meaningful value
The key issues with the Petersen et al and Miller et al studies is that they feature methodologies with low mundane realism, thus producing findings with little ecological validity
This is due to the use of artificial stimuli which has little personal meaning to the participants, and so does not accurately reflect everyday learning experiences
More recent research has suggested that Miller may have over-exaggerated the capacity of STM, and that the capacity is more similar to 4 chunks as opposed to the original 5-9 limit
This may reflect the outdated methodologies adopted by Miller and specifically, the lack of control over confounding variables which may have contributed to this inaccurate estimate
The MSM does not represent that some types of LTM can be retrieved unconsciously (e.g. procedural) whilst others must be retrieved consciously (e.g. semantic)
The MSM suggests that the amount of maintenance rehearsal determines the likelihood that the information will pass into the LTM, whereas Craik and Watkins (1973) suggest that it is the type of rehearsal which is more important
Craik and Watkins suggest that elaborative rehearsal, instead of prolonged rehearsal, is needed to transfer information from the STM into the LTM, by making links with existing knowledge
Shallice and Warrington found that their amnesiac patient KF had poor STM recall for auditory stimuli, but increasingly accurate recall for visual stimuli, suggesting that there may be multiple types of STM
Memories which have some kind of personal meaning to us, alongside details as to when and how these events occurred, as well as the associated people and places
Petersen et al. demonstrated that semantic memories were recalled from the left prefrontal cortex, whilst episodic memories were recalled from the right prefrontal cortex