Psychology - memory

    Cards (178)

    • capacity
      amount of info that can be stored in the memory at any one time
    • duration
      length of time it can be stored
    • encoding
      way the info/memory is stored (E.G. visual/acoustic/semantic)
    • sensory memory
      capacity: very large
      duration: milliseconds
      encoding: mainly visual, can be sound and touch
    • short-term memory (STM)
      capacity: 7+/-2 (miller)
      duration: 18-30 seconds (peterson and peterson)
      encoding: acoustic (baddeley)
    • long-term memory (LTM)
      capacity: huge
      duration: a life-time (bahrick)
      encoding: semantic (baddeley)
    • Sensory memory

      Studied by Sperling (1960)
    • Sperling's study of sensory memory for vision

      1. Flashing an image on a screen for a very brief instance
      2. Participants asked to remember as many letters as possible from a grid of 12 letters (displayed for 50ms)
      3. Participants could typically only recall around 4 letters before the grid faded from their memory
    • Sperling's study of sensory memory capacity

      • Trained participants to distinguish the difference between three tones (high, medium and low)
      • Exposed the same grid for 50ms
      • When the grid disappeared a tone was sounded which corresponded to the row on the grid (top=H, middle=M, bottom=L)
      • Recall was on average around 3 out of 4 symbols from any row
      • Suggests that the iconic store can retain approximately 76% of all data received
    • Sperling's study of sensory memory duration

      • If there was a delay between the showing of the grid and the sounding of the tone, more and more info was lost (50% available after 0.3 sec delay and only 33% after 1 sec delay)
    • STM - capacity(miller)

      miller found that the capacity was 7+/-2: (5-9)
      • used digit spans to test how many digits could be memorised at one time
      • numbers of increasing lengths were read out to P's for them to read them back until they made a mistake
    • how to increase the capacity of STM
      • chunking: grouping letters or numbers together (remember 5-9 chunks)
      • rhythmic grouping: grouping numbers together rhythmically (phone number)
      • utilising our LTM
    • STM - duration (peterson and peterson) - aim
      • aim: to test how long STM lasts when rehearsal is prevented
    • STM - duration (peterson and peterson)- procedure

      procedure:
      • P's were briefly shown a consonant trigram (3 letters)
      • P's were asked to count backwards in multiples of 3 from a specified number to stop them rehearsing the letters.
      • after intervals of 3,6,9,12,15 or 18 seconds, P's were asked to recall the trigram
      • this was repeated several times using different trigrams
    • STM - duration (peterson and peterson)- findings
      findings:
      • P's were able to recall about 80% of trigrams after a 3 sec interval
      • as the time of intervals increased then the amount of trigrams P's were able to recall decreased
      • after 18 secs, fewer than 10% of trigrams were recalled correctly
    • STM - duration (peterson and peterson)- conclusion
      conclusion:
      • our STM duration is 18-30 secs
    • STM - duration (peterson and peterson)- evaluation
      evaluation:
      • lacks ecological as given an artificial task
      • possible that interference from previous trigrams caused the poor recall
    • STM - duration (peterson and peterson)- critical evaluation
      critical evaluation:
      • used standardised procedure
      • reliable as it is scientific and can be replicated
      • lacked mundane realism and external validity
      • only considered STM duration for one type of stimuli
    • STM - encoding (baddeley)- aim

      aim: to explore the effects of acoustic and semantic encoding in STM
    • STM - encoding (baddeley)- procedure

      procedure:
      • P's were divided into 4 groups, each group heard a list of 5 words drawn from of the following categories:
      1. acoustically similar words (man, mad, map)
      2. acoustically dissimilar words (pen, day, few)
      3. semantically similar words (great, big, large)
      4. semantically dissimilar words (hot, old, late)
      • immediately after hearing the words they were asked to recall them in the correct order
      • this was carried out 4 times
    • STM - encoding (baddeley)- findings
      findings:
      • acoustically similar words had 55% recall accuracy and acoustically dissimilar words had 75% recall accuracy
      • similarity of meaning had only a very slight detrimental effect
      • effects of acoustic similarity disappeared when P's long-term learning was tested. this suggests a major factor affecting encoding is whether items are being sorted into STM or LTM
    • STM - encoding (baddeley)- conclusion
      conclusion:
      • findings support conrad:
      1. STM relies more on sound of words than their meaning, showed through the difficulty P's had in recalling acoustically similar words
    • STM - encoding (baddeley)- evaluation
      Evaluation:
      • the use of the experimental method allows a causal link between the type of coding used in STM and the accuracy of recall.
      • may be to reductionist
    • STM - encoding (conrad)
      • looked at whether people used acoustic encoding even when info was provided visually
      • P's shown random sequence of 6 consonants rapidly
      • strings of consonants where either acoustically similar or dissimilar
      • asked to right down letters in the order they appeared
      • most errors made involved substitution of similar sounding letters
      • more difficult to remember acoustically similar letters
      • concluded that items are stored in the STM in some form of acoustic code
    • STM - encoding (brandimonte)
      • under some circumstances visual encoding is the superior method
      • P's presented with 6 line drawings of familiar objects and asked to memorise them in order
      • P's asked to form mental image of each one in turn to subtract a specified part of drawing
    • LTM - duration (bahrick)- aim
      aim: to establish the existence of very long-term memory to see whether there was any difference between recognition and recall
    • LTM - duration (bahrick)- procedure
      procedure:
      • tracked down graduates from a particular high school in america over a 50-year period
      • 392 graduates were shown pictures from their high-school yearbook
      • recognition group: for each photo, P's given a group of names and asked to select the name that matched the photo.
      • recall group: P's asked to name the people in the photos without being given a list of possible names
    • LTM - duration (bahrick)- findings
      findings:
      recognition group:
      • 90% correct after 14 years
      • 80% correct after 25 years
      • 75% correct after 34 years
      • 60% correct after 47 years
      recall group:
      • 60% accurate after 7 years
      • less than 20% accurate after 47 years
    • LTM - duration (bahrick)- conclusions
      conclusions:
      • people can remember certain types of info for almost a lifetime
      • very long-term memory seems to be better when measured by recognition tests
    • LTM - duration (bahrick)- evaluation
      evaluation:
      • ecological validity as uses meaningful stimulus material and tested people on memories of their own lives
      • unclear whether the drop off in accuracy reflects the limits of duration or a general decline in memory with age
    • LTM - encoding (baddeley) - aim and procedure
      • focuses on the semantic part of the study for LTM (aim and procedure are the same)
    • LTM - encoding (baddeley)- findings
      findings:
      • semantically similar words had 55% recall accuracy
      • semantically dissimilar words had 85% recall accuracy
      • recall was the same for acoustically similar and dissimilar words
    • LTM - encoding (baddeley)- conclusion
      conclusion:
      • LTM mainly makes use of semantic coding
    • LTM - encoding (baddeley)- evaluation
      evaluation:
      • use of the experimental method allows a causal link between the type of coding used in LTM and accuracy of recall
    • multi-store model of memory - atkinson and shiffrin
    • MSM (AO1)

      Model of memory proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin
    • Stages of MSM
      1. Sensory memory
      2. Short-term memory (STM)
      3. Long-term memory (LTM)
    • Information passes through the stages of MSM in a linear fashion
    • Sensory memory
      External stimuli enters in an uncoded form
    • Attention
      • Vital for information to pass from sensory memory to STM
    See similar decks