If there was a delay between the showing of the grid and the sounding of the tone, more and more info was lost (50% available after 0.3 sec delay and only 33% after 1 sec delay)
used digit spans to test how many digits could be memorised at one time
numbers of increasing lengths were read out to P's for them to read them back until they made a mistake
how to increase the capacity of STM
chunking: grouping letters or numbers together (remember 5-9 chunks)
rhythmic grouping: grouping numbers together rhythmically (phone number)
utilising our LTM
STM - duration (peterson and peterson) - aim
aim: to test how long STM lasts when rehearsal is prevented
STM - duration (peterson and peterson)- procedure
procedure:
P's were briefly shown a consonant trigram (3 letters)
P's were asked to count backwards in multiples of 3 from a specified number to stop them rehearsing the letters.
after intervals of 3,6,9,12,15 or 18 seconds, P's were asked to recall the trigram
this was repeated several times using different trigrams
STM - duration (peterson and peterson)- findings
findings:
P's were able to recall about 80% of trigrams after a 3 sec interval
as the time of intervals increased then the amount of trigrams P's were able to recall decreased
after 18 secs, fewer than 10% of trigrams were recalled correctly
STM - duration (peterson and peterson)- conclusion
conclusion:
our STM duration is 18-30 secs
STM - duration (peterson and peterson)- evaluation
evaluation:
lacks ecological as given an artificial task
possible that interference from previous trigrams caused the poor recall
STM - duration (peterson and peterson)- critical evaluation
critical evaluation:
used standardised procedure
reliable as it is scientific and can be replicated
lacked mundane realism and external validity
only considered STM duration for one type of stimuli
STM - encoding (baddeley)- aim
aim: to explore the effects of acoustic and semantic encoding in STM
STM - encoding (baddeley)- procedure
procedure:
P's were divided into 4 groups, each group heard a list of 5 words drawn from of the following categories:
acoustically similar words (man, mad, map)
acoustically dissimilar words (pen, day, few)
semantically similar words (great, big, large)
semantically dissimilar words (hot, old, late)
immediately after hearing the words they were asked to recall them in the correct order
this was carried out 4 times
STM - encoding (baddeley)- findings
findings:
acoustically similar words had 55% recall accuracy and acoustically dissimilar words had 75% recall accuracy
similarity of meaning had only a very slight detrimental effect
effects of acoustic similarity disappeared when P's long-term learning was tested. this suggests a major factor affecting encoding is whether items are being sorted into STM or LTM
STM - encoding (baddeley)- conclusion
conclusion:
findings support conrad:
STM relies more on sound of words than their meaning, showed through the difficulty P's had in recalling acoustically similar words
STM - encoding (baddeley)- evaluation
Evaluation:
the use of the experimental method allows a causal link between the type of coding used in STM and the accuracy of recall.
may be to reductionist
STM - encoding (conrad)
looked at whether people used acoustic encoding even when info was provided visually
P's shown random sequence of 6 consonants rapidly
strings of consonants where either acoustically similar or dissimilar
asked to right down letters in the order they appeared
most errors made involved substitution of similar sounding letters
more difficult to remember acoustically similar letters
concluded that items are stored in the STM in some form of acoustic code
STM - encoding (brandimonte)
under some circumstances visual encoding is the superior method
P's presented with 6 line drawings of familiar objects and asked to memorise them in order
P's asked to form mental image of each one in turn to subtract a specified part of drawing
LTM - duration (bahrick)- aim
aim: to establish the existence of very long-term memory to see whether there was any difference between recognition and recall
LTM - duration (bahrick)- procedure
procedure:
tracked down graduates from a particular high school in america over a 50-year period
392 graduates were shown pictures from their high-school yearbook
recognition group: for each photo, P's given a group of names and asked to select the name that matched the photo.
recall group: P's asked to name the people in the photos without being given a list of possible names
LTM - duration (bahrick)- findings
findings:
recognition group:
90% correct after 14 years
80% correct after 25 years
75% correct after 34 years
60% correct after 47 years
recall group:
60% accurate after 7 years
less than 20% accurate after 47 years
LTM - duration (bahrick)- conclusions
conclusions:
people can remember certain types of info for almost a lifetime
very long-term memory seems to be better when measured by recognition tests
LTM - duration (bahrick)- evaluation
evaluation:
ecological validity as uses meaningful stimulus material and tested people on memories of their own lives
unclear whether the drop off in accuracy reflects the limits of duration or a general decline in memory with age
LTM - encoding (baddeley) - aim and procedure
focuses on the semantic part of the study for LTM (aim and procedure are the same)
LTM - encoding (baddeley)- findings
findings:
semantically similar words had 55% recall accuracy
semantically dissimilar words had 85% recall accuracy
recall was the same for acoustically similar and dissimilar words
LTM - encoding (baddeley)- conclusion
conclusion:
LTM mainly makes use of semantic coding
LTM - encoding (baddeley)- evaluation
evaluation:
use of the experimental method allows a causal link between the type of coding used in LTM and accuracy of recall
multi-store model of memory - atkinson and shiffrin