agree w/ NR such as Murray->> underclass: welfare state creates dependency->> encourage single parenthood/ discourage working
however RR more interested in crime prevention than why crime is committed
RR believe social bonds help prevent crime, zero tolerance approach
Wilson- Broken window theory
Broken window theory
when one window is left, broken may will->> when residents of a neighbourhood don't care about their environment low-level deviance tolerated eg. NY in the '90s (crime fell a lot)
zero tolerance response to low-level crime and anti-social behaviour->> ensure collective conscience, boundary maintenance, social solidarity
eval: policy coincided w/ economic growth and reduction on poverty->> correlation doesn't = causality
->> over-policing on ethnic groups and police discretion
RR eval
children from lone-parent families more like to commit crimes but also more likely to commit low-level crime
crime may be seen as a rational choice->> PM: pros and cons weighed up and crime is committed out of thrill
Shaw and McKay- Broken window theory
inner city areas= transient and have social solidarity where migrants don't place roots