ansoff's

Cards (12)

  • ansoff's matrix
    a model used to compare the level of risk involved with the different growth strategies. it helps managers decide on a direction for strategic growth
  • ansoff's matrix 4 strategies
    market penetration, product development, market development, diversification
  • market penetration
    trying to increase market share in existing markets. least risky method. done to increase sales. best in growth markets.
  • market penetration methods
    sales promotion, pricing strategies, advertising, extension strategies
  • product development
    selling new products in existing markets. medium risk. requires some market share, but not extensive. products are sold to same audience. best when market has good growth potential
  • product development when to use
    business has good brand loyalty, is a market leader, has high cash flow, has strong RD
  • market development
    selling existing products to new markets. new markets refers to different segments or geographical locations (eg international). medium risk. market research required. be aware of culture differences
  • market development methods
    create new advertising campaign/promotion, use new channels of distribution (eg e-commerce instead of retailers)
  • diversification
    selling new products to new markets. very risky (no experience in new market). market research needed. R&D needed. doesn't have to be completely unrelated with what's already being done
  • diversification when to use
    when market is saturated, product is in decline stage, high profits are likely, business has to reduce dependence on limited product range
  • advantages of ansoff's matrix
    - forces market planners and management to think about the expected risks of moving in a certain direction
    - it lays out possible strategies for growth
  • disadvantages of ansoff's matrix
    - fails to show that MD and diversification require a change to every day running of the business
    - does not take into account the activities of external competitors
    - accurate predictions are difficult due to unforeseen events
    - oversimplifies options available for growth