Chapter 1 - Collection of Data

    Cards (13)

    • Random Sample
      Every item/person has an equal chance of being selected.
      Advantages : representative, unbiased
      Disadvantages : need sample frame, can be expensive and time consuming, needs a large sample size
    • Stratified sample
      the size of each strata (group) in the sample is in proportion to the sizes of strata in the population.
      Advantages : represents population fairly, best used for groups with unequal sizes
      Disadvantages : time consuming
    • Systematic sampling
      choosing items in the population at regular intervals
      Advantages : population evenly sampled, machine can be used, sample is easy to select
      Disadvantages : not strictly random sample
    • Cluster sampling
      the population is divided into natural groups, groups are chosen at random and every member of groups are sampled. useful for large populations
      Advantages : economically efficient - less resources required, can be representative (if small clusters sampled)
      Disadvantages : may not be representative (could be biased), high sampling error
    • Quota sampling
      population grouped by characteristics and a fixed amount is sampled from every group
      Advantages : quick to use, cheap, don't need a sample frame
      Disadvantages : not random - BIASED
    • Opportunity sampling
      using the people/items that are available at the time
      Advantages : quick, cheap, easy
      Disadvantages : not random - BIASED
    • Judgement sampling
      when the researcher uses their own judgement to select a sample, they think will represent the population
      Advantages : easy, quick
      Disadvantages : not random - BIASED, may be unreliable
    • Petersen Capture-recapture
      first capture/total = tagged/second capture
    • Variables
      Explanatory (independent) - variable that changes
      Response (dependent) - variable that is measured
      Extraneous - variables that you are not interested in but could affect the result of your experiment
    • Laboratory experiments
      researcher has full control over variables. Conducted in a lab or similar environment
      Advantages : easy to replicate (more reliable results), extraneous variables can be controlled (more valid results)
      Disadvantages : people may behave differently under test conditions (could affect validity of results)
    • Field experiments
      carried out in everyday environment. Researcher has some control over variables. They set up the situation and controls the explanatory variable but has less control over extraneous variable.
      Advantages : more accurate - reflects real life behaviour
      Disadvantages : cannot control extraneous variables, not as easy to replicate (less reliable)
    • Natural experiments
      carried out in everyday environment. Researcher has little/no control over variables.
      Advantages : reflects real life behaviour
      Disadvantages : low validity, difficult to replicate, cannot control extraneous variables
    • Simulation
      A way to model random events using random numbers and previously collected data. Could be used to help you predict what could actually happen in real life.
    See similar decks