Research methods - year 13

Cards (48)

  • Nominal Data
    data is put into named categories or frequency is counted
  • Ordinal Data
    Data is put into order or rated on a scale
  • Interval Data
    Data uses standardised measurements such as time or weight
  • P=

    probability risk that the results may have occurred by chance
  • Statistical test
    1. directional or non-directional
    2. lowest p value to use
    3. number of participants
  • One tailed test
    directional
  • Two tailed test

    non directional
  • Stats test conclusion

    The results are significant as the calculated value of (CV) is higher than the critical value of (cv) for a one tailed/two tailed test when n=20 and p=0.05. This means the experimental hypothesis has been supported and the null hypothesis has been rejected and we can conclude that
  • Sign test
    1. calculate difference between scores
    2. sign of difference
    3. calculated value = whichever sign is smallest
    4. decide whether its directional or non-directional
    5. level of significance
    6. identify critical value
    7. establish significance
  • Type 1 error

    a researcher wrongly concludes that there is a significant difference between the IV and DV and wrongly concludes results are significant when they are not
  • P value is too large
    too lenient = type 1 error
  • Type 2 error

    researcher wrongly concludes there is not a significant difference between IV and DV and incorrectly concludes the results are not significant when they are
  • P value is two small
    too strict = type 2 error
  • how to assess reliability
    1. Test-retest reliability
    2. Inter-rater reliability
  • Test-Retest Reliability

    the extent to which a procedure can be easily replicated using the same participants
  • Inter-Rater Reliability

    the extent to which different researchers are likely to record similar findings using the same procedure
  • How to improve reliability
    1. Remove extraneous variables
    2. Better operationalisation
  • Reliability
    the extent to which a procedure produces consistently similar findings using the same participants when repeated
  • Internal validity

    the extent to which a study successfully measures what is intended
  • External validity
    extent to which findings of a study can be successfully generalised to other settings to wider populations and over time
  • Face validity

    subjectively measures what is intended at face value (ask participants what they thought a test was measuring)
  • Concurrent validity
    produces similar results when compared with another established method
  • Ecological validity

    generalised to a variety of real life settings
  • Temporal validity

    generalised over time
  • Improving internal validity
    1. Remove extraneous variables
    2. Better operationalisation
  • Improving external validity
    1. improve mundane realism
    2. increase sample cross-culturally
  • Content analysis

    identifies patterns and trends in the material before turning these into operationalised coding system (quantitative data)
  • Thematic analysis

    identifies themes in material before writing extensive and detailed notes (qualitative data)
  • Content analysis
    1. read material and look for patterns and trends
    2. turn behaviour in operationalised categories
    3. read content again and tally categories
    4. make conclusions
  • Inter-Rater Reliability
    using two or more researchers to perform the same content analysis at the same time using the same categories
  • Thematic analysis
    1. read material and look for themes in behaviour
    2. write extensive and detailed qualitative notes
    3. read notes and reduce them to recurring themes
    4. make conclusions
  • Features of a science
    1. Objectivity
    2. Empirical methods
    3. Replicability
    4. Falsifiability
    5. Theory construction
    6. Hypothesis testing
    7. Paradigm
    8. Paradigm shift
  • Objectivity
    collecting data without bias or opinion
  • Empirical methods

    recognised and objective methods used to generate observable evidence
  • Replicability
    being able to repeat the procedure of a study to see if similar results occur every time
  • Falsifiability
    can be tested to be correct or false
  • Theory Construction
    ideas about the world become tested to explain behaviour
  • Hypothesis testing

    statement including a clear IV and DV can be tested
  • Paradigm
    shared set of assumptions and methods used to research and understand the world around us
  • Paradigm shift
    the established paradigm has been challenged by a new piece of evidence which the existing paradigm cannot explain