A claim for damages is always available, as of right, to the claimant when a contractual term has been broken
The purpose of damages is to put the victim in the position they would have been in if the contract has been properly completed and performed by the defendant.
This means that the Court looks at what should have happened and the consequences of this performance not happening.
1. Factual Causation: Use the 'but for' test to show that the breach factually caused the loss. If the loss would have happened regardless of the breach, then the breach could not be said to have caused the loss. (MonarchSteamship v Karlshamns)
This is the usual measure of damages for a breach of contract. It refers to the innocent party's loss of bargain. It includes the profits that the party would have expected to receive had the contract been performed, whilst taking into account the costs the party would have incurred to earn that profit. The aim of expectation loss is to put the innocent party in the same position as if the contract had been performed.
The injured party must take reasonable steps to minimise the effects of the breach (BritishWestinghouse Electric v UndergroundElectric Railways).
In an anticipatory breach, the innocent party is not bound to sue immediately when they know there is a possibility of a breach. They can choose to wait until the breach is an actual breach (Hochester v de la tour)
Liquidated damages are where the amount of damages has been fixed by a term in the contract. The Courts will award this fixed amount if it represents an accurate and proper assessment of loss. If not, it is seen as a penalty and is not enforceable (Parking Eye v Beavis).
Besides compensatory damages, the Courts can also award Nominal Damages (no loss suffered but breach in contract), 'WrothamPark' Damages (try to quantify the sum which might be reasonably negotiated between the parties for giving permission to the wrongdoer to act as they did and Speculative Damages (granted in speculative situations e.g. mental distress)
Equity helps to add flexibility to the strict nature of the law, which helps with achieving justice. Equitable remedies are awarded where damages is an inadequate remedy and justice would not be served merely by damages. Equitable remedies are not a right, as they are at the discretion of the Courts. Unlike damages, equitable remedies are not constrained by remoteness of damage or causation.
One equitable remedy available in contract law is an injunction. One type of an injunction is a mandatory injunction. This is a court order requiring a party to the contract to do something.
This is where the Courts order one party to perform their contractual obligation. Specific performance will not be available where damages would be an adequate remedy or contracts involving personal service and contracts of employment (PageOne Records v Britton).
A 'rescission' is an equitable remedy. All equitable remedies are discretionary meaning the courts will only award it when it is fair to do so in all circumstances. Rescission is the idea of putting the parties back into the positions they were in before the contract was made – it's as if the contract had neverexisted.
This can be a repudiatory breach by the guilty party to the contract. At common law, a breach can result in the termination of the contract if the affected so chooses, where:
There is a breach of condition, or a breach of an innominate term construed as a condition.
One party refuses to perform their obligations under a contract at all or the substantial part of its obligations, including anticipatory breach.
One party makes it impossible to perform the contract.
Where there has been a misrepresentation, the Courts can look to the MisrepresentationAct1967. In Section 2(2), this states that the Courts have the discretion to use the equitable remedy of rescission, or they may award damages. Rescission will typically be given before damages for a misrepresentation unless certain situations have arisen.
To be able to award compensatory damages, the claimant must prove that the breach caused the loss, not just provided the opportunity for the loss.
This is proved by showing factual and legal causation has been met
Compensatory damages - Causation and Remoteness
2. Legal Causation: Check for the remoteness of the damage caused by the breach. This does not establish how much compensation will be payable (damages), merely which losses can be subject of compensation (damage). (Hadley v Baxendale)
Calculating Compensatory Damages - Loss of a Bargain
One way is by calculating the difference in value between the goods or servicesrequired and those actually provided (Bence Graphics International v Fasson).
Another way is by calculating the difference between the contract price and the price in the market. If the claimant still is in profit, there is no loss (Charter v Sullivan). If there is no available marker, then the claimant can recover the full loss (Thompson v Robinson)
Another way is by calculating the loss of profit not just for the goods but also in other contracts.