Grant et al were interested in determining whether environmental context-dependency effects would be found with the type of material and the type of tests typically encountered in school
Their focus is more on study conditions than on differences in classroom testing conditions because they hold that students have more control over their study environments than over their test environments
Observations had shown them that many high school and college students study material in environments very different from those in which they are tested
IV's were: (i)whether the participant read the two page article under silent or noisy conditions (ii)whether the participant was tested under matching or mismatching conditions
DV:the participant’s performance on a short-answer recall test and a multiple-choice test.
Method:
background noise was recorded during lunchtime in a university cafeteria.
The tape was played at a moderately loud level.
A two-page, three-columned article on psychoimmunology was the to-be-studied material.
The dependant variable of retrieval was measured in two ways (recall and recognition):
Recall: a short-answer test of 10 questions (always given first)
Retrieval: 16 multiple choice questions-
The entire procedure lasted about 30 minutes.
Result: showed studying & testing in same environment produced better resu
Context-dependency effects

Effects on learning of newly learned meaningful material, regardless of whether a short-answer test or a multiple-choice test is used to assess learning
Although there was no overall effect of noise on performance, the fact that there was evidence for context-dependency suggests students are better off studying without background noise as it will not be present during actual testing