Less than 0.01% of all sensory information, that is received by human senses every second, reaches consciousness
Approx. 5% is stored permanently
Information that isn't lost from sensory memory is transferred to short-term memory (the temporary memory store)
Information in is no longer than its original form since it has been encoded
When selecting information to attend to in sensory memory or to be retrieved from long-term memory, the information enters short term memory
Duration of short-term memory is longer than sensory memory, approx. 18 - 20 seconds but can occasionally reach 30 seconds
Decay (forgetting information) occurs at approx. 12 seconds if information is unrehearsed.
Rehearsal keeps information in short term memory and aids the transfer of information from short term to long term memory.
Maintenance rehearsal is maintaining information in short term memory by using mental repetition; simply repeating it over and over again without effects of interruptions.
Miller (1956) conducted an empirical study that showed that most people could only store around 7 unrelated independent items (numbers, letters, words etc.).
To expand the capacity, separate bits of information can be combined into parts/chunks, which is called chunking. Think of the mobile phone number and how we read it.
George Sperling explored the properties of iconic memory. 12 letters were flashed for approximately 50 milliseconds. The participants would generally recall 4 or 5 letters but they report that they felt they saw all the letters but the memory of the other letters had faded when after writing 3-5 down.
Sperling believed that all 9 letters are stored in the viewer's memory for a short time but only some letters could be moved into short-term memory and named as the memory fades rapidly, and the information disappears.
George's follow-up experiment was that the participants were shown 3 rows, 4 words per row. After viewing all 12 letters, a tone would be given, indicating that the participant should report the content of 1 of the 3 lines. Participants could report lines perfectly once they are familiarized with the system. The results show that the image of all letters was stored in iconic memory after the image disappeared.
Basic Information-Processing Operations Involved in Memory
1) Encoding: Transforming sensory inputs into a form, allowing it to be stored in memory. In other words, process of changing information into a form that could be stored in memory
2) Storage: Holding, keeping process of memory
3) Retrieval: Process of information being extracted/taken from memory
☼ Temporary storage for information received visually (visual system)
☼ Duration of iconic memory approx. 0.2 - 0.4 seconds
☼ Each image is registered in iconic memory before the previous image fades, viewing the world in a continuous manner (similar to a series of frames that makes a movie seem continuous. Movies run 64 frames per second to create the illusion of movement)
This effect is when the retrieval or recall of information varies according to the relative position of the material; recall is usually better at the beginning and the end of a list than the middle.
This effect supports the two distinct sub-systems of memory, long-term and short-term memory.
This effect is when the first few items in a list are recalled well, when compared with middle items, during a free recall test. This is usually attributed to more successful rehearsal of the first few items, which information enters long-term memory and can be retrieved later on.
Items are probably rehearsed and transferred to LTM before STM's capacity is full. It is likely that items from the start of the list would be forgotten unless they are stored in LTM.
Primacy effect still occurs if there is a delay of more than 12-30 seconds, between learning and recalling items.
This effect is when the final few items in a list are recalled well, when compared with middle items, during a free recall test. This is usually attributed to the final words being retained in short-term memory.
Recency effect would still occur even if the list of items is increased. Maintenance rehearsal is probably used to retain the information. However, recency effect wouldn't occur when there is a delay of more than 12-30 seconds between learning and recalling items (delayed free recall). Delaying recall would consist of having the participants do something distracting before recalling.
Middle items are presented too late to be adequately rehearsed and transferred into long-term memory. Furthermore, the information is too early to be held in short-term memory without rehearsal. (Seen as U-shape graph)
Conducted an experiment showing that short-term memory has duration of approx. 12-30 seconds unless the information is rehearsed. This study also demonstrates the role of maintenance rehearsal in short-term memory.
Participants were asked to remember a single nonsense trigram of 3 consonants such as 'dkt'. Recalls made by participants were recorded after various time delays, which are: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, or 18 seconds.
Participants were given a task, which prevented them from rehearsing the trigram. They were asked to count backwards by threes from the time each trigram was presented to the time a light signaled to then recall it. This is filled delay.
☼ The model doesn't adequately explain the interaction between different memory stores. An example would be LTM must interact with STM because chunking is successful when meaning is given to the material that is chunked. Furthermore, we also probably rely on information that is already stored in LTM to help determine the information we would pay attention to in sensory memory.
☼ The model doesn't show why coding of information changes between the different memory stores.
☼ Other explanations of memory such as levels of processing (Craik & Lockhart 1972) don't set a clear distinction between STM and LTM. Instead, it views memory as a continuum rather than separate/distinct systems.
When we repeat material to ourselves over and over again, we can keep the information in our STMs as long as we rehearse it, if rehearsed for long enough, it passes into the LTM
Why is supporting evidence a strength for the MSM?
Studies show that the STM and LTM are qualitatively different, e.g. baddely showed people get acoustically similar words mixed up when using the STM and semantically similar words when using the LTM, telling us it's because they code differently. Different kinds of coding tells us that they are different stores, therefore supporting the MSM idea of them being two separate stores.