How true it is, is it measuring what it claims to measure
Research hypotheses
Directional
Non-directional
Directional research hypotheses
Based on previous research and says which direction the research will go
Non-directional research hypotheses
Says there will be an effect, just not which one
Operationalisation of variables
Putting our hypotheses/variables into measurable terms e.g. anxiety - heart rate
Population
All members of a group that we are interested in
Sample
Used to make generalisations about populations
Sampling bias
Over or under representation of one particular category or group in a sample
Random samples
Unbiased, everyone has equal chance
Stratified samples
Pre-define groups in population then select randomly, each group is proportionally represented. Useful when sample too small to ensure proportional representation by random sampling
Quota samples
Sample is stratified, but selection from each stratum is left up to researcher. May be bias
Cluster samples
Naturally occurring groups or clusters containing people in target population. May be bias
Self-selecting samples
Participants selected by own actions e.g. volunteers. May be bias
Opportunity/convenience samples
May be bias
Snowball samples
Participants contact other participants for the researcher. Bias
Sample size
Larger the better = more representative, less likely to be biased, easier to find significant results with statistical tests - costly & time consuming
Purpose of experiments
Identify cause and effect relationship
Independent variable (IV)
Manipulated to cause effect in dependent variable
Dependent variable (DV)
Measured to see effect of IV
Extraneous variables
Random variables that effect a participant's performance but unpredictably
Confounding variables
Change systematically with IV
Independent groups design
Split in half, random allocation to conditions (no order effects)
Repeated measures design
All participants do all conditions - order effects = counter balancing
Matched pairs design
Matched on important variables, random allocation of participants from each pair to a condition: (difficult to find perfect matches)
Experimenter effects
Effects caused by what the experimenter expects or wants. Double blind
Participant effects
"Hawthorne effect" - single blind
Strengths of experiments
Tight variable control and operationalisation helps identify cause and effect relationship
Replication = good reliability
Weaknesses of experiments
Tight variable control can lowerconstruct validity
Artificial environment can lead to different behaviour (ecological validity)
Ordinal level
Data in relative order, or rank on a scale
Interval level
Equal intervals between values, e.g. IQ scores
Ratio level
Equal intervals between values and zero point, e.g. reaction times
Histograms and boxplots
Generally used to analyse and explore data
Bar and line charts
Used to present summarised results
Mode
Nominal level, unaffected by extreme values, represents most frequent value
Median
Ordinal, interval, ratio level, unaffected by extreme values, represents only middle value
Mean
Interval/ratio level, represents all values, distorted by extreme values
Frequency distribution graphs
Histograms and box plots used for ordinal data or higher
Range
Distance between lowest and highest values, ordinal and interval level, easy to calculate and understand, sensitive
Standard deviation and variance
Measure of dispersion around the mean, average amount of deviation from the mean, interval/ratio level, represents all deviations from the mean, sensitive