1. Interview based technique: USbased conducted by FBI
2. Began in 1970s, FBI conducted in-depth interviews with 36 sexually motivated murderers inc Ted Bundy and CharlesManson to find why/how they committed crimes concluding that data could be categorised into organised/disorganised crimes
3. If data from crime scene matched a category, we can generate other likely characteristics to narrow down suspects
Applies statistical procedures to analyse crime scene evidence so general behaviour patterns are established across crime scenes so statistical database can be used as a baseline for comparison
Assumption that serial killers offend in familiar areas so understanding their behaviour patterns provides a centre of gravity (circle) around offender base
Offenders commit crimes in 2 ways: Marauders (proximity to home, hide identity) and Commuters (travels distance away from home w/o hiding identity but around area of some familiarity)
No single criminal gene identified, but several genes that are linked to inc offending behaviour such as low activity MAOA gene and CDH13
Earlier evidence from twin, adoption and family studies found criminal behaviour to run in families and more closely related you are to a criminal, more likely you'll be one
Research by Tihonen found people in the sample who had both the low activity MAOA gene and CDH13 gene were 13x more likely to commit multiple violent offences
Suggests criminals may inherit genes which make them more likely to commit crimes. No single criminal gene identified, but several genes that are linked to increased offending behaviour
Earlier evidence from twin, adoption and family studies found criminal behaviour to run in families and more closely related you are to a criminal, more likely you'll be one
Lange found that MZ twins in prison were more likely to have a co-twin who'd also been in prison compared to DZ twins. As MZ twins have 100% of their genes in common, but DZ twins only have 50% of the same genes, suggesting genetics plays a role
Brunner (1980s) studied a Dutch family finding many of its males behaved in a violent/aggressive way and many were involved in serious crimes of violence including rape and arson. Men found to have deficiency of MAOA warrior gene leading to Jekyll and Hyde behavioural reaction
The unusual aggressive behaviour in the Dutch family could be argued to now be an expectation so these acts are accepted, and behaviour could be due to environment (social learning theory) rather than biological reasons
In the Irish travelling community, males are taught to be strong and fight but this doesn't mean it's due to biological reasons but due to how they're nurtured
Assuming someone who has the criminal gene will be a criminal is a form of biological determinism which predicts those who have the gene will be a future criminal
There is an ethical issue with biological determinism because we do not currently have any way to successfully help those at risk of becoming a criminal in the future or protect society from them
If we can predict a high level of the presence of MAOA genes in certain areas, we can put into place educational programmes that can help prevent their gene from coming into play
Raine conducted many studies of a APD brain, reporting that scans showed decreased activity in pre-frontal cortex which regulates emotional behaviour. He found an 11% reduction in the volume of grey matter in the prefrontal cortex in those with APD compared to controls
When offenders with APD were asked to empathise (with someone on a film feeling pain), their empathy reaction did activate, suggesting that offenders with APD do have empathy but may have a neural switch that's turned on/off unlike normal brains which have it continually on
Kandel and Freed reviewed evidence of frontal lobe damage (including prefrontal cortex) and antisocial behaviour and found that those with damage tended to show antisocial behaviour, emotional instability and inability to learn from mistakes which are characteristics of offenders
The research by Kandel and Freed was correlational so cannot establish cause and effect between brain and offending as there may be a third variable e.g. poverty that may actually be the causal factor
Using a small, simple experimental finding like reduced activity in the prefrontal cortex underemphasises the complex and diverse reasons why people commit offences, which may mean that schemes can't be developed to help counteract/prevent offending behaviour