It offers realistic predictions of how trade affects the income of groups representing different factors of production (e.g., landlords, workers)
Trade is almost sure to divide society into gainers from trade and losers from trade because changes in relative product prices are likely to raise the rewards of some factors and lower the rewards of others
The Heckscher-Ohlin theory claims to provide powerful insights into the basis for trade and the effects of trade, including the gains and losses for different production factors
The Heckscher-Ohlin approach states that trade arises from differences in the availability of factor inputs in different countries and differences in the proportions in which these factors are used in producing different products
An event that changes product prices in a country unambiguously raises the real returns to the factor used intensively in the rising-price industry and lowers the real returns to the factor used intensively in the falling-price industry in the long run, regardless of which goods the sellers of the two factors prefer to consume
Opening of trade increases the relative price of wheat in the US, leading to a rise in the real income of the owners of land (the factor used intensively in producing wheat) and a decline in the real income of the providers of labor (the factor used intensively in producing cloth)
The result clashed with an intuition many economists had shared. It seemed, for instance, that if U.S. laborers spent a very large share of their incomes on cloth, they might possibly gain from free trade by having cheaper cloth. Not so, according to the theorem. Opening trade must enable one of the two factors to buy more of either good, and it will make the other factor poorer in its ability to buy either good.
The coefficients a, b, c, and d are physical input/output ratios. These indicate how much land (a and c) or labor (b and d) is required to produce one unit of each good.
A factor more closely associated with the rising-price sector will have its real return (its purchasing power with respect to either product) rise. A factor more closely associated with other sectors will have its real purchasing power cut.
The more a factor is specialized, or concentrated, into the production of exports, the more it stands to gain from trade. Conversely, the more a factor is concentrated into the production of the importable good, the more it stands to lose from trade.
The factor-price equalization theorem: Given certain conditions and assumptions, free trade will equalize not only commodity prices but also the prices of individual factors between the two countries, so that all laborers will earn the same wage rate and all units of land will earn the same rental return in both countries even if factors cannot migrate between countries.
The Heckscher-Ohlin approach to trade provides important insights, in theory, about the gains from trade, the effects of trade on production and consumption, and the effects of trade on the incomes of production factors both within each country and internationally.
The first formal efforts to test the H-O theory used the simple model of two factors of production and U.S. trade data. These tests failed to confirm the H-O theory.
The United States is relatively abundant in arable land, and tends to be a net exporter of temperate-zone agricultural products such as wheat, corn, and soybeans.
The United States has abundant endowments of some natural resources-such as coal-and tends to be a net exporter of these resource products, while it is a net importer of many other natural resource products-such as petroleum-which are found more abundantly in some other countries.
The United States is relatively abundant in skilled labor, including scientists and engineers employed in R&D, and tends to be a net exporter of products that are skilled-labor-intensive such as machinery, aircraft, and chemicals.