2.2 Psychodynamic Theories of Criminality

    Cards (9)

    • Theory of MD

      - psychodynamic theory of criminality created by psychologist Bowlby
      - he theorised that there was a critical period in which children needed to form and maintain an attachment with their mother or mother figure for healthy emotional development.
      - this had to be done within the first three years of a childs life.
      - he argued that frequent or prolongued seperations would result in the attachment breaking down.
      - this would cause permanent and irreversible emotional damage which would lead to affectionless psychopathy (no guilt or remorse for criminal behaviour) and low iq
      - they would then have an increased likelihood of criminality.
      - low iq could mean they struggle in school and would leave with poor qualifications and would have to commit crime to survive and make a living
    • Bowlby's study of the 44 thieves

      - studies 44 juvenile thieves and compared them to 44 non juveniles
      - affection less psychopathy was only found in the juvenile group
      - this suggests AP may lead to offending
      - 12 reported separations from caregivers so suggesting AP was due to maternal deprivation.
    • Evaluation
      + study of 44 thieves supports the theory
      - criticised for reasons including:
      —> the data was obtained through interviews which could be distorted through the social desirability bias
      —> criminals may not be the most honest group to interview, and may try to shift the blame onto their mothers or childhood.
      —> the study used retrospective data meaning the data gathered may be incorrectly remembered making it invalid
      - opposing data for the theory: lewis 1954: analysed data from 500 young people and found MD was a poor predictor of future offending.
      + has made a positive contribution to criminal psychology. Researchers have pointed to the importance of childhood experiences and parent child relationships as an influence on offending e.g Blackburn.
    • What is the superego?

      - The superego, or the morality principle, is the moral part of the perosnality.
      - It wants us to maintain a moral standard of behaviour and sets the standard.
      - It punishes us with guilt when we do not meet this.
      - It comes from identification with the same sex parent.
      - If this doesnt develop properly, then this can often lead to criminality.
    • Weak superego
      Why does this superego develop?
      - this is caused by absent or unloving parents.
      - identification is disrupted or absent which in turn leads to a weak superego.
      How does this superego lead to crime?
      - if it does not develop properly, it becomes weak and cannot balance the demands of the ID
      - personality is ruled by the ID and gives into the selfish demands.
      - this causes crime as the superego is overpowered and crime is due to the selfish and impulsive wishes of the id.
    • Deviant superego
      Why does this superego develop?
      - this develops through identification with a deviant same sex parent.
      - the superego reflects standards of the same sex's parent.
      - we internalise their attitudes and behaviour through identification.
      How does this superego lead to crime?
      - if the parent has deviant attitudes, we will then have deviant attitudes .
      - this leads to crimes due to a lack of appropriate morals and not knowing how to behave correctly.
    • Harsh superego
      Why does this superego develop?
      - develops as a result of strict and punitive parenting.
      - it upholds a very high standrard of behaviour to meet and punishes the individual with lots of guilt if they fail to meet it.
      How does this superego lead to crime?
      - the individual would feel guilty often and need punishment.
      - they would give into the overpowering desires of the ID and seek punishment.
      - they would commit crime with a wish to be caught so that the punishment could reduce their feelings of guilt.
    • Evaluation - impulsivity
      - a problem of freuds theory of offending is that it suggests crimes are a consequence of impulsivity and impulsive desires of the ID.
      - this is a problem as it fails to account for crimes that are planned and require patience and meticulous organisation, such as fraud.
      - these cannot be explained as a result of immediate gratification
      - this is only a half explanation.
    • evaluation - determinism
      - is deterministic
      - the cause is childhood events that create permanent damage in the adult personality.
      - the permanence of this means that the individual cannot exercise free will to stop being a criminal and would not take responsibility for their crimes, believing it is inevitable.
      - this means we are unable to prevent offending in society and raises a socially sensitive implications for now these individuals should be managed within society.