Freud claimed that identification processes are weaker for females than males as girls do not experience castration anxiety. As a result, Freud claimed that females are morally inferior to males.
Levels of conformity in men represents conformity in all people (Asch). Early research into fight or flight response was conducted exclusively on male animals as it was thought female hormones fluctuate too greatly.
Research that is centred on men. 'Normal' behaviour is judged according to a male standard, meaning that female behaviour is often judged to be 'abnormal' or 'deficient' by comparison
Male anger is often seen as a rational response to external pressures e.g. sexual jealousy and infidelity. Female anger however is less 'accepted'. Instead, concepts such as premenstrual syndrome emerged and are seen by many critics as a social construction which medicalises female emotions, especially anger.
Recent brain scans have found no sex differences in brain structure and processing, suggesting the data from Maccoby and Jacklin was popularised as it fitted social stereotypes of the time
Ingalhalikar et al (2014) found there are more connections between the two hemispheres in women's brains than men's brains, suggesting the stereotype of women being better at multitasking may have some biological truth
Male researchers are more likely to have their work published and studies that find evidence of gender differences are more likely to be published than those that do not, perpetuating the prevailing view of gender difference
Ainsworth's Strange Situation is considered ethnocentric as it reflects the norms and values of Western society. When applied in Japan, babies were more likely to be considered insecurely attached, because they were so distressed during separation, when they had rarely experienced separation from their mothers.
The idea that behaviour can only be properly meaningful and understood in the context of the norms and values of the society or culture in which it occurs
Many classic studies in psychology are culturally biased, as they were conducted with US participants. Replications in different countries produced different results.
Takano and Osaka found that 14 out of 15 studies comparing the USA and Japan found no evidence of the traditional distinction between individualism and collectivism, suggesting cultural bias in research is less of an issue than it once was.
The first IQ tests in the 1930's were culturally biased, leading to prejudice against groups of people and racist discourse about the genetic inferiority of particular cultural and ethnic groups.
Ekman (1989) suggests that basic facial expressions for emotions are the same all over the human and animal world, suggesting some universal behaviour.
All human behaviour has an internal or external cause and in principle it should be possible to identify and describe these causes. Such causes are completely outside a person's control.
Behaviour/actions/traits are to an extent governed/dictated by internal/external forces, but we still have some element of control over/some free will to control our behaviour/actions/traits etc.
Behaviour is determined by biological factors outside of our control e.g. the influence of the ANS on the stress response or the influence of genes, neurotransmitters and brain structure on mental health.
Determinism focuses on the causes of behaviour. A causal explanation is based on the scientific notion that behaviour is caused/determined by internal/external factors – there is a cause and effect relationship.
Laboratory experiments are controlled so the only thing that changes is the IV, all other extraneous variables are controlled allowing a researcher to establish if there is a significant effect on the DV.
Focuses on the causes of behaviour. A causal explanation is based on the scientific notion that behaviour is caused/determined by internal/external factors – there is a cause and effect relationship.
Controlled so the only thing that changes is the IV, all other extraneous variables are controlled allowing a researcher to establish if there is a significant effect on the DV.
The determinism-free will debate involves two competing approaches and as a result what is a strength for one, will be a weakness for the other and vice-versa.