Social change is where whole societies, rather than just individuals adopt new attitudes and beliefs
An example of social change is the suffragette movement
How a minority influence creates social change:
drawing attention
consistency
deeper processing
augmentation principle
snowball effect
social cryptomnesia
protests draw attention to a cause or issue
consistency can cause the majority to think about their views
Deeper processing - this attention means majority start to think about the issues raised by the minority
the augmentation principle - the majority value the importance of the cause as the minority are risking their lives for it
Snowball effect - overtime more majority change their views and eventually the minority becomes the majority
Social cryptomnesia - eventually people have a memory that change occurred but don’t remember how it happened
Nolan et al (2008) investigated whether social influence processes led to a reduction in energy consumption in a community. They hung messages on the front doors of houses in San Diego saying that most residents were trying to reduce their energy usage. As a control, some residents had a different message that just asked them to save energy but did not reference other people’s behaviour. They found significant decreases in energy usage in the first group
Nemeth (1986) argues that the effects of minority influence are likely to be mostly indirect and delayed
the majority is influenced on matters only related to the issues at hand and not the central issue itself, and they are delayed because the effects may not be seen for some time
the effects of minority influence on social change may be fragile and its role in social influence limited
Mackie (1987) suggests majority views actually cause us to think more deeply about an issue rather than minority views, casting doubt on the role of deeper processing