The cognitive component of a biased attitude, defined as a generalization about a group, assigning nearly identical traits to all members of the group, without regard for existing variations among members
Prejudice
A hostile or negative attitude, emotional component, towards members of a particular group, based solely on their membership in that group
Discrimination
The behavioral component of the biased attitude, defined as an unjustified or harmful action towards members of a group, based on their membership in that group
Stereotypes of Princeton University students in 1933 (Gilbert, 1951) were highly consistent and remained stable over multiple repetitions until 1969 and across continents until 2010-2019
Stereotype Content Model
Explains how we perceive groups based on two key ideas: how friendly or threatening they are (Warmth) and how capable or skilled they are (Competence)
Groups seen as friendly and skilled earn our admiration
Groups seen as unfriendly but skilled spark envy
Groups viewed as friendly but unskilled evoke pity
Groups perceived as unfriendly and unskilled draw contempt, leading to serious dehumanization
Stereotypes
Generalized beliefs about a particular group of people, often based on limited information or personal experiences
Levels of stereotypes
National stereotypes
e.g. those attributed to Germany
Anglo-Saxon view of Germans
Preoccupation with anal matters, leading to an exaggerated openness regarding such topics
German national character
Strong anal-erotic element
Characterized by diligence, thriftiness, cleanliness, orderliness, and rule-orientation
Early and strict cleanliness education and swaddling practices in infants
Possible causes for German national character
Activation of stereotypes
1. Boomerang effects when individuals attempt to suppress their prejudices
2. Stereotypes can influence perceptions and behaviors
Ethnological analysis of German culture to understand stereotypes better
Methods used to study stereotypes
Surveys involving students from different European Union countries
Assessing perceptions of competence and warmth of various nations within the EU
Understanding the complexities of stereotypes and their impact on individuals and societies can promote inclusivity and combat prejudice
Stereotype
The cognitive component of a biased attitude, defined as a generalization about a group, assigning nearly identical traits to all members of the group, without regard for existing variations among members
Prejudice
A hostile or negative attitude, emotional component, towards members of a particular group, based solely on their membership in that group
Discrimination
The behavioral component of the biased attitude, defined as an unjustified or harmful action towards members of a group, based on their membership in that group
Stereotypes of Princeton University students in 1933 (Gilbert, 1951) were highly consistent and remained stable over multiple repetitions until 1969 and across continents until 2010-2019
Stereotype Content Model (Fiske et al., 2002)
Groups are perceived based on two key ideas: how friendly or threatening they are (Warmth) and how capable or skilled they are (Competence)
Groups seen as friendly and skilled earn admiration
Groups seen as unfriendly but skilled spark envy
Groups viewed as friendly but unskilled evoke pity
Groups perceived as unfriendly and unskilled draw contempt, leading to dehumanization
Stereotypes of social groups in Germany in terms of warmth and competence (Asbrock, 2010)
Shown in a 2x2 grid
Stereotypes of social groups in Romania in terms of warmth and competence (Stanciu, 2017)
Shown in a 2x2 grid
Nation stereotypes in the European Union (Cuddy et al., 2009)
Shown in a 2x2 grid
The Anglo-Saxon view of Germans as having a "preoccupation with anal matters" and an "anal national character" (Dundes, 1984)
Thinking on Autopilot: The automatic activation of stereotypes (Bargh, Chen & Burrows, 1996)
See experiment on the "Florida effect"
Boomerang effects when suppressing prejudices (Macrae et al., 1994)
Participants who successfully suppressed stereotypes in the first round showed more stereotypical responses in the second round
Automatic Activation of Stereotypes
Individuals with a "chronically egalitarian worldview" do not show automatic stereotype activation (Moskowitz et al. 1999)
Skin color and weapons (Correll et al., 2002)
Participants made more errors in "shooting" unarmed Black men compared to unarmed White men in a video game
Treatment in psychiatry (Bond et al., 1988)
Black psychiatric patients were more frequently restrained and medicated compared to White patients
Prejudices Against Migrants in Germany - Behavioral Data (Klink & Wagner, 1999)
Migrants received less favorable treatment in various everyday situations
Dependent variable (DV)
Frequency of the use of straitjackets and sedative medication to calm patients
George Gunnesch-Luca, Social Psychology, 02.04.2024, 22 / 56
Effects of Social Stereotypes
Treatment in Psychiatry (Bond et al., 1988)
Prejudices Against Migrants in Germany - Behavioral Data (Klink & Wagner, 1999)
Behavioral data
Housing offers from providers when calling after a newspaper ad
Asking for directions in a city
Requesting small change for making a phone call
Lost letter technique
Behavior of waitstaff in restaurants (time until order is taken)
Reservation of seats in a restaurant
Reaction to norm violations (cycling through pedestrian zones, frequency of complaints)
Call for a posted carpool notice (university cafeteria) for a weekend student carpool, acceptance of the carpool
Xenophobia in Germany - Behavioral Data (Klink & Wagner, 1999, p. 413)
Moderator effect
Significantly smaller effects in direct contact situations (e.g., asking for phone change) compared to situations with no contact (e.g., lost letters) or low contact (phone only)
Discrimination in the Training Market - (Robert Bosch Foundation, 2014, p. 24)
Method
Fake applications with variation of applicant's name