cours 6

Cards (75)

  • Stereotype
    The cognitive component of a biased attitude, defined as a generalization about a group, assigning nearly identical traits to all members of the group, without regard for existing variations among members
  • Prejudice
    A hostile or negative attitude, emotional component, towards members of a particular group, based solely on their membership in that group
  • Discrimination
    The behavioral component of the biased attitude, defined as an unjustified or harmful action towards members of a group, based on their membership in that group
  • Stereotypes of Princeton University students in 1933 (Gilbert, 1951) were highly consistent and remained stable over multiple repetitions until 1969 and across continents until 2010-2019
  • Stereotype Content Model

    • Explains how we perceive groups based on two key ideas: how friendly or threatening they are (Warmth) and how capable or skilled they are (Competence)
    • Groups seen as friendly and skilled earn our admiration
    • Groups seen as unfriendly but skilled spark envy
    • Groups viewed as friendly but unskilled evoke pity
    • Groups perceived as unfriendly and unskilled draw contempt, leading to serious dehumanization
  • Stereotypes
    Generalized beliefs about a particular group of people, often based on limited information or personal experiences
  • Levels of stereotypes

    • National stereotypes
    • e.g. those attributed to Germany
  • Anglo-Saxon view of Germans

    Preoccupation with anal matters, leading to an exaggerated openness regarding such topics
  • German national character

    • Strong anal-erotic element
    • Characterized by diligence, thriftiness, cleanliness, orderliness, and rule-orientation
  • Early and strict cleanliness education and swaddling practices in infants

    Possible causes for German national character
  • Activation of stereotypes

    1. Boomerang effects when individuals attempt to suppress their prejudices
    2. Stereotypes can influence perceptions and behaviors
  • Ethnological analysis of German culture to understand stereotypes better
  • Methods used to study stereotypes

    • Surveys involving students from different European Union countries
    • Assessing perceptions of competence and warmth of various nations within the EU
  • Understanding the complexities of stereotypes and their impact on individuals and societies can promote inclusivity and combat prejudice
  • Stereotype
    The cognitive component of a biased attitude, defined as a generalization about a group, assigning nearly identical traits to all members of the group, without regard for existing variations among members
  • Prejudice
    A hostile or negative attitude, emotional component, towards members of a particular group, based solely on their membership in that group
  • Discrimination
    The behavioral component of the biased attitude, defined as an unjustified or harmful action towards members of a group, based on their membership in that group
  • Stereotypes of Princeton University students in 1933 (Gilbert, 1951) were highly consistent and remained stable over multiple repetitions until 1969 and across continents until 2010-2019
  • Stereotype Content Model (Fiske et al., 2002)

    • Groups are perceived based on two key ideas: how friendly or threatening they are (Warmth) and how capable or skilled they are (Competence)
    • Groups seen as friendly and skilled earn admiration
    • Groups seen as unfriendly but skilled spark envy
    • Groups viewed as friendly but unskilled evoke pity
    • Groups perceived as unfriendly and unskilled draw contempt, leading to dehumanization
  • Stereotypes of social groups in Germany in terms of warmth and competence (Asbrock, 2010)
    • Shown in a 2x2 grid
  • Stereotypes of social groups in Romania in terms of warmth and competence (Stanciu, 2017)
    • Shown in a 2x2 grid
  • Nation stereotypes in the European Union (Cuddy et al., 2009)
    • Shown in a 2x2 grid
  • The Anglo-Saxon view of Germans as having a "preoccupation with anal matters" and an "anal national character" (Dundes, 1984)
  • Thinking on Autopilot: The automatic activation of stereotypes (Bargh, Chen & Burrows, 1996)

    See experiment on the "Florida effect"
  • Boomerang effects when suppressing prejudices (Macrae et al., 1994)

    Participants who successfully suppressed stereotypes in the first round showed more stereotypical responses in the second round
  • Automatic Activation of Stereotypes
    • Individuals with a "chronically egalitarian worldview" do not show automatic stereotype activation (Moskowitz et al. 1999)
  • Skin color and weapons (Correll et al., 2002)

    Participants made more errors in "shooting" unarmed Black men compared to unarmed White men in a video game
  • Treatment in psychiatry (Bond et al., 1988)

    Black psychiatric patients were more frequently restrained and medicated compared to White patients
  • Prejudices Against Migrants in Germany - Behavioral Data (Klink & Wagner, 1999)

    • Migrants received less favorable treatment in various everyday situations
  • Dependent variable (DV)

    Frequency of the use of straitjackets and sedative medication to calm patients
  • George Gunnesch-Luca, Social Psychology, 02.04.2024, 22 / 56
  • Effects of Social Stereotypes
  • Treatment in Psychiatry (Bond et al., 1988)
  • Prejudices Against Migrants in Germany - Behavioral Data (Klink & Wagner, 1999)
  • Behavioral data

    • Housing offers from providers when calling after a newspaper ad
    • Asking for directions in a city
    • Requesting small change for making a phone call
    • Lost letter technique
    • Behavior of waitstaff in restaurants (time until order is taken)
    • Reservation of seats in a restaurant
    • Reaction to norm violations (cycling through pedestrian zones, frequency of complaints)
    • Call for a posted carpool notice (university cafeteria) for a weekend student carpool, acceptance of the carpool
  • Xenophobia in Germany - Behavioral Data (Klink & Wagner, 1999, p. 413)
  • Moderator effect
    Significantly smaller effects in direct contact situations (e.g., asking for phone change) compared to situations with no contact (e.g., lost letters) or low contact (phone only)
  • Discrimination in the Training Market - (Robert Bosch Foundation, 2014, p. 24)
  • Method
    Fake applications with variation of applicant's name
  • Explanations of Stereotypes