Defends established institutions and values on the ground that they safeguard the 'fabric of society', giving security-seeking human beings a sense of stability and rootedness
Characterised by a belief in a strong but minimal state, combining economic libertarianism with social authoritarianism, as represented by neoliberalism and neoconservatism
Rejects theory and ideology in favour of practical experience: the approach to society should be flexible, with decisions made on the basis of what works
Implies a flexible approach to politics which asks what will work best and what is acceptable to the public in order to maintain social stability and cohesion
Principles and ideas such as 'human rights, 'a classless society' and 'equality' are naïve, impractical and dangerous because they can promote violence in the attempt to remake of society (often through revolution) that leads to worse rather than better conditions
A society 'without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation' — peace and survival of society depend on some careful change and adaptation through evolution, whereas the unbending pursuit of revolution or the unbending resistance to change would lead to conflict and chaos
Edmund Burke: 'Society is partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead and those who are to be born'
Constitutes the accumulated wisdom of the past, and the institutions, customs and practices of the past have demonstrated their value to earlier societies as they have proved 'fit for purpose' over time and survived
Conservatives argue that reform or change can only be justified if it takes place organically by evolving naturally in a peaceful, gradual way in order to strengthen existing institutions, customs and practices
Conservatives claim that any attempt to implement radical, wide-ranging changes will cut people off from the `traditional' basis of society and inevitably lead to instability, anxiety and insecurity
Conservatives hold a pessimistic, even Hobbesian, view of human nature, believing that humankind is innately selfish and greedy, anything but perfectible
Areas of disagreement amongst conservatives on their view of human nature
Traditional conservatives believe human nature can cause problems if left unchecked, whereas New Right conservatives believe it should be left unchecked
Traditional conservatives place emphasis on traditions and customs to guide human nature, whereas New Right conservatives feel it should shift and venture into new avenues
New Right conservatives view human nature as progressive with potential for self-seeking individualism, whereas traditional conservatives hold a more pessimistic view
If people did not acknowledge and act on their responsibilities and social bonds, human society would lack social cohesion and descend into Atomism (the idea that society is made up of self-interested and self-sufficient individuals)
An organic society is based on natural needs and instincts such as affection, security and concern, rather than an ideological blueprint devised by political theorists