The concept of ‘privity’ is contractual privacy, and determines who has a right of action when there is breach of contract.
Tweddle v Atkinson [1861]
Consideration must move from the promisee.
The General Rule
Rules of Privity:
General Rule
Agents making agreements
Restrictive covenants
Claiming damages on behalf of others
Collateral contracts
Agents making agreements
The law treats agent and principle as one and the same.
An agent is someone who enters into a contract on your behalf.
Restrictive covenants
These are promises not to treat land in a certain way.
They run with the land and bind successors.
Tulk v Moxhay [1848]
Although the contract was not between Tulk and Moxhay specifically, the covenant ran with the land so D was in breach of the restrictivecovenant.
The General Rule
Only a person that has provided consideration can sue.
Jackson v Horizon Holidays [1975]
C paid a month long holiday for his family.
Claiming damages on behalf of others.
Claiming damages on behalf of others
This happens where someone has been detrimentallyaffected by a contract they were not party to if it is fair.
Collateral Contracts
Two contracts are in place
The second is in place as a result of making the first
The second involved a guarantee of quality
Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951]
D assured C the paint would last 7 years. It lasted 3 months.
Collateral contracts
Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act [1999]
s1(1)(a) express right to sure
s1(1)(b) purporting to confer a benefit
s1(2) excluding the right to sue
Nissin Shipping v Cleaves [2003]
s1(1)(b) applied because the contract is specific in how much C should be paid and therefore purports to confer a benefit, giving him the right to sue.
s1(1)(a) of the Contracts (RTP) Act [1999]
agreement provides an express right to third parties to sue
s1(1)(b) of the Contracts (RTP) Act [1999]
agreement purports to confer a benefit implying that third parties can sue.