memory

    Cards (72)

    • STM
      - temporary
      - limited capacity 5-9
      - codes acoustically
      - duration of 18 seconds
    • LTM
      - permanent
      - unlimited capacity
      - codes semantically
      - duration of a lifetime
    • coding
      format information is stored in
    • baddeley research
      - 1- acoustically similar
      - 2- acoustically dissimilar
      - 3- semantically similar
      - 4- semantically dissimilar

      - STM- worse at 1
      - LTM- worse at 3
    • separate memory stores (AO3)

      - strength
      - identified difference between STM and LTM
      - important to understanding memory
      - led to MSM
    • artificial stimuli (AO3)

      - limitation
      - no personal meaning
      - doesn't tell us about different types of memory tasks
      - limited application to real life
    • capacity
      amount of memory which can be stored in
    • digit span + chunking

      jacobs
      - digits recall 9.3
      - letters recall 7.3

      miller
      - 7 observations -> 7 +/- 2
      - chunking reduced to 5
    • a valid study (AO3)

      - strength
      - replicated with more control and similar findings
    • not so many chunks (AO3)

      - limitation
      - reviews say it may be 4 +/- 1
    • duration
      length of time information can be stored for
    • margaret and peterson

      - 24 students
      - consonant syllable + 3 digit number
      - counted backwards in intervals to prevent rehearsal
      - 3 seconds- 80%
      - 18 seconds- 3%
    • bahrick et al.

      within 15 years of graduation
      - photo recognition- 90%
      - free recall- 65%

      after 48 years of graduation
      - photo recognition- 70%
      - free recall- 30%
    • meaningless stimuli (AO3)

      - limitation
      - doesn't reflect most everyday memory activities
      - lacks external validity
    • high external validity (AO3)

      - strength
      - meaningful memories
      - when studies on LTM used meaningless pictures recall rates were lower
    • multi store model

      - a representation of how memory works
      - sensory register, stm, ltm
      - describes how information is transferred from one store into another
    • msm diagram
    • sensory register

      - stores memory from the senses
      - vision- iconic
      - hearing- echoic
      - huge capacity
      - short duration
      - information passes through if you pay attention
    • maintenance rehearsal (rehearsal loop)

      when we repeat material to ourselves over and over again
    • research support (ao3)

      - strength
      - baddeley research study on coding supports msm
      - capacity and duration studies also support
      - supports the idea that stm and ltm are separate

      - counter
      - artificial stimuli used by studies
      - doesn't represent meaningful memories captured in every day life
      - may not be a valid model
    • more than one stm store (ao3)

      - limitation
      - kf case study
      - stm for digits was poor when read aloud to him but improved when he read it out himself
      - not a complete model
    • elaborative rehearsal (ao3)

      - limitation
      - prolonged rehearsal may not be needed to transfer information to ltm
      - when you link new knowledge with existing knowledge in ltm it doesn't require any prolonged rehearsal
      - suggests that msm doesn't fully explain how ltm is reached
      - not a complete model
    • episodic
      - ltm
      - personal events
      - time- stamped
      - places, objects, behaviours
      - conscious effort to retrieve
    • semantic
      - ltm
      - knowledge of world
      - not time-stamped
      - conscious effort to retrieve
    • procedural
      - ltm
      - how to do things- learned skills
      - no sonscious effort
    • clinical evidence (ao3)

      - strength
      - hm and clive wearing case studies
      - - episodic memory was impaired in both due to brain damage
      - semantic and procedural memories unaffected

      - counter
      - lack of control over variables- before or during injury
      - no knowledge of the individual's memory before brain damage
      - limits
    • conflicting neuroimaging evidence (ao3)

      - limitation
      - research concludes that semantic memory is located on the left side of the prefrontal cortex and episodic is on the right
      - however some say there's links with the left to encoding episodic, and right with retrieving episodic
    • real-world application (ao3)

      - strength
      - helps people improve memory
      - intervention plans put in place to improve episodic memory in old people as it is common for memory loss
      - against a control
    • working model memory

      - stm
      - suggests that stm is a dynamic processor of different types of information using subunits co-ordinated by a central decision-making system
    • central executive

      - co-ordinates the activities of the three subsystems in memory
      - monitors incoming data
      - allocates subunits to tasks
    • phonological loop

      - processes auditory information
      - phonological store- words you hear
      - articulatory process- allows maintenance rehearsal (repeating words in a loop)
    • visuo-spatial sketchpad

      - processes visual and spatial information
      - visual cache- visual data
      - inner scribe- arrangements of objects
    • episodic buffer

      - brings information together from other subsystems by recording events
      - provides a bridge to ltm
    • clinical evidence (ao3)

      - strength
      - kf case study
      - poor stm ability for auditory but fine visually
      - phonological loop damaged but visuo-spatial sketchpad intact

      - counter
      - unclear whether kf had other impairments which may have affected performance
      - little control over variables
    • dual-task performance (ao3)

      - strength
      - supports existence of visuo-spatial sketchpad
      - visual and verbal tasks performed at the same time
      - performance was same as separately
      - when both tasks were visual/verbal it worsened performance
      - due to same subsystem
    • nature of central executive (ao3)

      - limitation
      - lack of clarity
      - most important but least understood
      - ce needs to be clearly specified
      - may consist of separate subcomponents
      - unsatisfactory
      - challenges integrity
    • interference
      forgetting because one memory blocks another, meaning it is forgotten or distorted
    • proactive interference

      older memories disrupt the recall of newer memories
    • retroactive interference

      newer memories disrupt the recall of older memories
    • research on effects of similarity (McDonald + McGeoch)

      - retroactive interference
      - had to learn words until 100% accuracy
      - then given another list
      - 1: synonyms
      - 2: antonyms
      - 3: unrelated
      - 4: consonants
      - 5: 3 digit numbers
      - 6: no list, rest, control

      - 1 had worst recall
    See similar decks