General dispositions/characteristics that people possess that uniquely influence their cognition and behaviour
Traits cannot be directly observed, but rather must be inferred from patterns of behaviour and experience that are known to be valid trait indicators
State
The condition (intensity/centrality/arousal) of the corresponding traits at any given point in time
Discrete
Personality type - discrete category which individuals are placed in one category
One category or the other
Continuous
Personality Traits - Continuous dimension, individuals placed along the dimension, allows for variation
On a continuum
Every human possess ALL traits, but not at the same intensity or importance
Personality elements are (tend to be) dimensionally (i.e., on a continuum) and hierarchically arranged
These dimensions are (tend to be) independent (orthogonal) from each other
Traits are relatively stable over time and situation, however they do fluctuate and/or drift
Somatotypes
Based on physique and temperament
Somatotypes
Endomorphic Body
Mesomorphic Body
Ectomorphic Body
Lack of empirical support
Oversimplification
Promotes harmful stereotypes
Lexical hypothesis - if individual differences (personality) are important, they should be encoded in language through trait-descriptors
Lexical Approach - Frequency of word use and number of synonyms indicates importance of specific trait
Lexical approach is a good starting point but not a full theory, lacks underlying mechanisms
Cardinal traits
Dominate a person's entire personality, create need
Central traits
Characterise a person's daily interactions, major characteristic of an individual
Secondary traits
Exhibited in specific situations or preferences, affect behaviour in fewer situations and are less influential
Allport's theory had no empirical support and never developed a standardised measurement
Allport's theory proposed personality is more than just traits, includes motivation/drives and interaction of biology, psychological and social factors
Cattell used factor analysis to reduce large numbers of data into clusters/factors, leading to 16 individual traits measured by the 16PF
Ergs
Innate drives/motivators (relate to survival instincts) that cause us to attend to stimulimore readily than other
Sentiments
Complex attitudes (deeper/latent), aggregates of attitudes, and sentiments. How we feel about people or situations
Attitudes
Constructs that express our particular interests in people or objects in specific situations. Predict how we will behave in a particular situation
Dynamic lattice
The organised complexity and interrelation of dynamic traits
Source traits
Major dimensions of personality
Inferred from patterns of behaviour
Consists of clusters of surface traits
Surface traits
Relate to an individual's overt behaviours
Cluster together and thus have high correlations
E.g., extraversion (source) measured by surface traits of sociability, carefreeness, contentedness
Cattell's 16PF assessment measures 16source traits and 46surface traits
Allport
Extended the Lexical Approach
Traits cannot predict behaviour in a specific situation but are consistent over time
Traits were real structures that existed in the individual, located in the nervous system (would one day be found!)
Traits come together to produce a unique individual
Cattell's Factors Influencing Personality
Genes
Environment
Intelligence - given personality is moulded through learning, intelligent people may pick up the reward quicker
Q-Data (questionnaire)
Psychometric self-report assessment
Easy to administer, quick access to information
People can lie to make themselves look good (impression management)
May not have an objective view of themselves
L-Data (life record)
Behavioural records collected primarily from peer-ratings
Can be more objective
Limited info
T-Data (test)
Objective tests in standardised conditions
Reduce impression management
Provides objective data
However limited use
Cattell Pros
Major contribution to personality and intelligence
Developed first viable psychometric assessment of personality (16PF)
Proposed State-Trait dichotomy
His data to a great part gave rise to the Big 5
Cattell Cons
Relative inability to replicate the structure of 16PF
Almost absolute reliance to factor analysis and statistics