bandura and chaney

Cards (45)

  • Some had no model to see how they would react in terms of aggression when no one was around
  • Psychological/physical impacts the study may implicate behaviors that the child might show in the future
  • Children couldn't give consent so the adults had to consent for the children to take part of the experiment
  • Inter-rater reliability was high r-0.89 but it is biased as observers were the ones to make their opinions
  • Ecological validity is low because they used a bobo doll which isn't a real person so they may not imitate the exact same behavior
  • Ethnocentric because they are all children from the same university nursery so it cannot be generalized due to socio-economic factors
  • Male models

    Had greater impacts on imitation over female models
  • Boys
    Imitated more physically aggressive acts than girls
  • There was little difference in verbal aggression between boys and girls
  • Witnessing aggression in a model can be enough to produce aggression by an observer, prior to the study aggression was more of a gradual process
  • Chaney- a pilot study
  • Aim
    Use of operant conditioning as a way to get children to improve their compliance, through the use of rewards to encourage children to take their medication
  • Chaney creates a new inhaler device

    As a good effect for positive reinforcement in children
  • Operant conditioning

    Learning through being rewarded or punished when the environment has been manipulated
  • Adherence
    Following the advice or guidelines that you are given
  • Made a comparison between the aerosol output of the standard/small volume of the spacer device
  • Participants were approached by researchers at home before the funhaler was mentioned
  • They were interviewed on their existing use of the inhaler
  • Given the funhaler for 2 weeks and reported over the phone and told to take snapshots of whether or whenever they had used the funhaler-the spinner will move and the whistle will blow when they take a breath in and out
  • After the use of the inhalers they were then visited again by the researchers and the parents were interviewed and completed the matched questionnaires
  • They had randomly checked if the funhaler was being used via the telephone
  • Random sample

    Collected people from clinics who were prescribed with the medication
  • 32 children/ 22 males/10 females
  • Aged 1.5-6 years old
  • Conducted in the home environment in different regions of Australia
  • Children's parents had provided informed consent and participated through doing questionnaires and taking part in phone interviews did a self report
  • IV
    Whether the child had used the standard or smaller volume spacer device (the Breath-a-Tech)
  • DV
    Adherence levels/how well the participants had responded to taking the medicine
  • Informed consent was given by the parents as the children were too young to give it
  • Privacy/confidentiality was ensured as all data, aims and responses were kept anonymous when they were briefed
  • Reliability- materials and procedure was standardized to allow the research to be repeated by other psychologists
  • Ecological Validity- it was a field experiment so it was high as it was a natural occurring environment where their daily lives were not being impacted
  • Ethnocentric-yes only took part in Australia- but they had chosen participants from different regions of the country making it less ethnocentric
  • Issues: cultural bias/ethnocentric, sample bias
  • 68% of children had reported pleasure when using the funhaler whereas only 10% enjoyed using the standard device
  • When surveyed at random 81% of children had used the funhaler found to have been medicated the previous day compared to 59% of children using the existing small volume spacer
  • Devices that use self-reinforcement strategies can improve the overall health of children as the rewarding nature of the device positively reinforces delivery of the medications
  • Bandura's research was conducted with children aged between 3-6 years old.
  • The study involved two groups - one group received rewards while taking their medication (funhaler) and another group did not receive any rewards (standard device).
  • Children were asked if they liked or disliked the devices, and those who preferred the funhaler were more likely to take their medication regularly.