Some had no model to see how they would react in terms of aggressionwhennoonewasaround
Psychological/physicalimpacts the study may implicatebehaviors that the child might show in the future
Children couldn't give consent so the adults had to consent for the children to take part of the experiment
Inter-rater reliability was highr-0.89but it is biased as observers were the ones to make their opinions
Ecological validity is low because they used a bobo doll which isn't a real person so they may not imitate the exact same behavior
Ethnocentric because they are all children from the same university nursery so it cannot be generalized due to socio-economic factors
Male models
Had greaterimpacts on imitation over female models
Boys
Imitated more physicallyaggressive acts thangirls
There was little difference in verbal aggression between boys and girls
Witnessing aggression in a model can be enough to produceaggression by an observer, prior to the studyaggression was more of a gradual process
Chaney- a pilot study
Aim
Use of operant conditioning as a way to get children to improve their compliance, through the use of rewards to encourage children to take their medication
Chaney creates a new inhaler device
As a good effect for positive reinforcement in children
Operant conditioning
Learning through being rewarded or punished when the environment has been manipulated
Adherence
Followingtheadviceorguidelinesthatyouaregiven
Made a comparison between the aerosol output of the standard/small volume of the spacer device
Participants were approached by researchers at homebefore the funhaler was mentioned
They were interviewed on their existing use of the inhaler
Given the funhaler for 2weeks and reportedover the phone and told to take snapshots of whether or whenever they had used the funhaler-thespinner will move and the whistle will blow when they take a breath in and out
After the use of the inhalers they were then visitedagain by the researchers and the parents were interviewed and completed the matchedquestionnaires
They had randomly checked if the funhaler was being used via the telephone
Random sample
Collectedpeople from clinics who were prescribed with the medication
32children/ 22 males/10 females
Aged 1.5-6yearsold
Conducted in the home environment in different regions of Australia
Children's parents had provided informed consent and participated through doingquestionnaires and taking part in phoneinterviews did a self report
IV
Whether the child had used the standard or smallervolumespacerdevice (the Breath-a-Tech)
Informed consent was given by the parents as the children were too young to give it
Privacy/confidentiality was ensured as all data, aims and responses were kept anonymous when they were briefed
Reliability- materials and procedure was standardized to allow the research to be repeated by other psychologists
Ecological Validity- it was a field experiment so it was high as it was a natural occurring environment where their daily lives were not being impacted
Ethnocentric-yes only took part in Australia- but they had chosen participants from different regions of the country making it less ethnocentric
Issues: cultural bias/ethnocentric, sample bias
68% of children had reported pleasure when using the funhaler whereas only 10% enjoyed using the standard device
When surveyed at random 81% of children had used the funhaler found to have been medicated the previous day compared to 59% of children using the existing small volume spacer
Devices that use self-reinforcement strategies can improve the overallhealth of children as the rewarding nature of the device positively reinforces delivery of the medications
Bandura's research was conducted with children aged between 3-6 years old.
The study involved two groups - one group received rewards while taking their medication (funhaler) and another group did not receive any rewards (standard device).
Children were asked if they liked or disliked the devices, and those who preferred the funhaler were more likely to take their medicationregularly.