Prior to Piaget it was felt that children were just quantitatively different to adults, that a child simply knew less than an adult. However Piaget found that a child's thinking is qualitatively different, not a child knowing less, the child thinks in a completely different way
Piaget's idea that children learn by actively exploring their environment and forming their own mental representations of the world has revolutionised teaching
Howe et al (1992) found that whilst all children had increased their knowledge about the topic they had not come to the same conclusions, supporting the concept that each child learnt and formed their own personal mental representations despite the same learning environment
Piaget underplayed the role of other people in learning, ignoring the importance of learning from an expert and the child being a 'little apprentice' rather than a 'little scientist'
Piaget's search task mixes up competence (underlying ability) and performance (whether someone actually does it), leading him to underestimate infants' abilities
Bower & Wishart (1972) found that 4 month old infants could find a toy in complete darkness, suggesting they had object permanence earlier than Piaget thought
Violation of expectation research by Baillargeon and DeVos (1991) suggests that children develop object permanence at 3-4 months, and that it may be an innate skill