Content analysis

    Cards (13)

    • Content analysis is an indirect observational method used to analyse human behaviour. This often produces qualitative data (written words or transcripts). This is then transformed into quantitative data.
    • Steps to perform a content analysis:
      1. Decide a research question.
      2. Select a sample (eg randomly / systematically) from a larger quantity of all possible data (eg diary entries / children's books).
      3. Coding - Researcher decides on categories / coding units to be recorded (eg occurrences of particular words), these are based on the research question.
      4. Work through data - Read the sample and tally the number of times the pre-determined categories appear.
      5. Data analysis - Can be performed on quantitative data to look for patterns.
    • Coding units must be completely operationalised, meaning they are defined as clearly as possible.
    • Testing for reliability and consistency:
      • Test-retest. Run the content analysis again on the same sample and compare the two sets of data.
      • Inter-rater reliability. A second observer also performs the content analysis with the same data sets and behavioural categories. These would then be compared.
      • A correlation would then be conducted to test how closely related the variables are.
    • Strengths of content analysis:
      • High external validity - The 'artefacts' used are not solely created for the research but have rather been taken from the real world, allowing findings to be gerneralised.
    • Strengths of content analysis:
      • Replicable - Procedures are very clear and tend to be standardised. The categories within are also operationalised, allowing a very clear set of instructions that can be followed.
    • Limitations of content analysis:
      • Researcher / observer bias - They may interpret the text in a way supporting their pre-existing views, meaning the study may lack validity.
    • Limitations of content analysis:
      • Lacks validity - Data was not collected under controlled conditions, meaning it may lack validity. For example, written historical records (eg diaries) may not contain an accurate record of the past.
    • Thematic analysis is when researchers start attempting to identify deeper meanings of the text by allowing themes to emerge.
    • Performing a thematic analysis:
      1. Collect text / recordings into text through transcription.
      2. Read text / transcripts fist to spot patterns that can be coded and collected.
      3. Re-read transcripts to look for emergent themes.
    • Strengths of thematic analysis:
      • This stops the research imposing their own bias on the analysis (by only looking for what they want to see), as they looks for general themes that emerge.
    • Strengths of thematic analysis:
      • High external validity.
      • Easy to gather a sample.
      • Easy to replicate.
    • Limitations of thematic analysis:
      • Subjective interpretation.
      • Data is not collected in controlled conditions.
    See similar decks