›Achievement in education has generally increased over the past 30 years›However, girls have improved significantly more than boys
external factors of girls achievement:
the impact of feminism
changes in the family
changes in womens employment
girls changing ambition
the impact of feminism
Since the 1960’s, feminism has grown and challenged patriarchy in all areas of society, Though progress still needs to be made, feminism has had considerable success in improving women’s opportunities and raising women’s expectations of their lives,
Evidence from McRobbie (1994): girls magazines
›In the 1970s they emphasised the importance of getting married and not being “left on the shelf”
›Nowadays, they contain images of assertive, independent women
changes in family
-increase in divorce
-female headed lone families
-increase in cohabitation
-women are having less children
-more women are staying single
changes in employment:
equal pay act 1970
sex discrimination act 1975
girls changing ambition
How girls see themselves and where they can go in future can have a significant impact on their education
sue sharp: Girls’ priorities in the 1970s were love and marriage.
In the 1990s this changed to careers and independence.
girls changing ambition:
How are changing ambitions a result of feminism?
Feminism has made it possible for girls to have realistic ambitions, including changes in how women are perceived and laws such as the Equal Pay Act.
How this positively impacted girls’ educational achievement?
If girls are able to have ambitions that are realistic, that provides them with more motivation to work hard in school, which could lead to better grades.
girls changing ambition:
internal factors
-equal opportunities policies
-positive roles models in schools
-GCSE and coursework
-teacher attention
-challenging stereotypes in the curriculum
-selection and league tables
equal opportunities policies:
›The belief that boys and girls are entitled to the same opportunities is now part of mainstream thinking and this influences educational policies›For example, programmes such as GIST (Girls Into Science and Technology) and WISE (Women Into Science and Engineering) aim to encourage girls’ participation in non-traditional areas›Additionally, the introduction of the National Curriculum in 1988 has removed one source of gender inequality, as it meant that girls and boys now studied same subjects at school
equal opportunities policies- meritocracy:
›Equal opportunities have removed many of the barriers to girls’ educational achievement, making education more meritocratic›Meritocracy = literally ‘rule by merit’›Merit = hard work›Therefore, meritocracy is a fair system where those who work the hardest get the best rewards›So, if education is meritocratic, this means that girls, who generally work harder than boys, will now see this reflected in their achievement
positive role models in schools:
›There are now more female teachers and head teachers in schools compared to the past›This provides a pro-education role model for girls, showing that they can achieve positions of importance and giving them non-traditional goals to aim for›Teachers are a particularly important role model for young girls in school because becoming a teacher involves a lengthy and successful education
GCSE and coursework:
Gorad (2005)
›Found that the gender gap in achievement increased in 1989 when GCSE was introduced›Most GCSEs included coursework at the time›Why might this have increased the gender gap?
Mitsos and Browne (1998)
›Concluded that girls do better than boys in course work because they are more conscientious and organised›Therefore, if GCSEs are coursework-based, girls will end up with better GCSE grades
teacher attention:
challenging stereotypes:
›Research in the 70s/80s found that:›Reading schemes portrayed women mainly as housewives and mothers›Physics books showed them as being frightened by science›Maths books depicted boys as more inventive
challenging stereotypes:
However, Weiner (1995) argues that since the 1980s..
›Teachers challenge stereotypes more›Sexist images of girls and women removed from learning materials›This presents girls with more positive and achievement-driven images of what women can do
selection and league tables:
selection and league tables:
symbolic capital and symbolic violence:
symbolic capital and symbolic violence
›Archer found that by performing their working-class feminine identities, the girls gained symbolic capital from their peers›She identifies several strategies that the girls followed for creating a valued sense of self, that brought them into conflict with the school:
being loud, having a boyfriend and hyper-heterosexual feminine identity
symbolic capital and symbolic violence:
successful working class girls:
›Although working class girls in general are likely to underachieve, some do succeed and go on to higher education›However, even they may be disadvantaged by their gender and class identities›E.g. Evans found that successful girls wanted to go to university to increase their earning power, but not for themselves – to help their families›Also, ‘caring’ was a crucial part of their identity, leading them to remain at home while studying, limiting their choice of university and the market value of their degree
What have sociologists focused on regarding boys' education?