Tulving realised the multi-store model's view of long-term memory was too simplistic and inflexible.
episodic
semantic
procedural
episodic memory
= long-term memory store for personal events. It includes memories of when the events occurred and of the people, objects, places and behaviours involved.
memories have to be retrieved consciously and with effort.
memories are time-stamped= remember when they happened as well as what happened.
semantic memory
= long-term memory store for our knowledge of the world, included facts and knowledge of what words and concepts mean.
memories need to be recalled deliberately.
memories are nottime stamped
less vulnerable todistortion and forgetting than episodic memory.
procedural memory
= long-term memory store for our knowledge of howtodothings, included learned skills.
don't need to make a consciouseffort to recall memories.
Evaluation- clinical evidence
= evidence from a famous case study of HM and Wearing.
Episodic memory in both men was severely impaired due to brain damage. But their semantic memories were relatively unaffected- still understood the meaning of words. eg: HM couldn't remember stroking a dog half an hour ago but didn't need to have the concept of dog explained.
continued
procedural memories also intact- knew how to walk+ speak. eg: Wearing- professional musician still could read music+ play piano.
supports Tulving's idea that there are different memory stores in LTM- one can be damaged but another store is unaffected.
Evaluation- counterpoint
= studying people with brain injuries can help researchers to understand how memory is supposed to work normally.
Limitation= they lack control of variables, brain injuries experienced by participants are unexpected. Researchers had no way of controlling what happened to the participant before or during the injury.
Researcher had no knowledge of the individual's memorybefore the damage. - otherwise it's difficult to judge exactly how much worse it is afterwards.
lack of control limits what clinical studies can tell us about differenttypes of LTM
Evaluation- conflicting neuroimaging evidence
limitation= there are conflicting research findings linking types of LTM to areas of the brain.
eg: Buckner and Petersen concluded that semantic memory is located in the left side of the prefrontalcortex and episodic on the right.
however other research links the left prefrontal cortex with episodic memories and the right prefrontal cortex with semantic memories.
this challenges any neurophysiological evidence to support types of memory as there is poor agreement on where each type might be located.
Evaluation- real world application
strength= understanding types of LTM allows psychologists to help people with memory problems.
eg: as people age they experience memoryloss. But research has shown this seems to be specific to episodic memory- it becomes harder to recall memories of personal experiences that occurred relatively recently through pastepisodic memories remain intact.
continued
Belleville devised an intervention to improve episodic memory in older people. Trained participants performed better on test of episodic memory after training than a control group.
shows that distinguishing between different types of LTM enables specific treatments to be developed.