types of long-term memory

    Cards (10)

    • Tulving realised the multi-store model's view of long-term memory was too simplistic and inflexible.
      • episodic
      • semantic
      • procedural
    • episodic memory
      = long-term memory store for personal events. It includes memories of when the events occurred and of the people, objects, places and behaviours involved.
      • memories have to be retrieved consciously and with effort.
      • memories are time-stamped= remember when they happened as well as what happened.
    • semantic memory
      = long-term memory store for our knowledge of the world, included facts and knowledge of what words and concepts mean.
      • memories need to be recalled deliberately.
      • memories are not time stamped
      • less vulnerable to distortion and forgetting than episodic memory.
    • procedural memory
      = long-term memory store for our knowledge of how to do things, included learned skills.
      • don't need to make a conscious effort to recall memories.
    • Evaluation- clinical evidence
      = evidence from a famous case study of HM and Wearing.
      • Episodic memory in both men was severely impaired due to brain damage. But their semantic memories were relatively unaffected- still understood the meaning of words. eg: HM couldn't remember stroking a dog half an hour ago but didn't need to have the concept of dog explained.
    • continued
      • procedural memories also intact- knew how to walk+ speak. eg: Wearing- professional musician still could read music+ play piano.
      • supports Tulving's idea that there are different memory stores in LTM- one can be damaged but another store is unaffected.
    • Evaluation- counterpoint
      = studying people with brain injuries can help researchers to understand how memory is supposed to work normally.
      • Limitation= they lack control of variables, brain injuries experienced by participants are unexpected. Researchers had no way of controlling what happened to the participant before or during the injury.
      • Researcher had no knowledge of the individual's memory before the damage. - otherwise it's difficult to judge exactly how much worse it is afterwards.
      • lack of control limits what clinical studies can tell us about different types of LTM
    • Evaluation- conflicting neuroimaging evidence
      limitation= there are conflicting research findings linking types of LTM to areas of the brain.
      • eg: Buckner and Petersen concluded that semantic memory is located in the left side of the prefrontal cortex and episodic on the right.
      • however other research links the left prefrontal cortex with episodic memories and the right prefrontal cortex with semantic memories.
      • this challenges any neurophysiological evidence to support types of memory as there is poor agreement on where each type might be located.
    • Evaluation- real world application
      strength= understanding types of LTM allows psychologists to help people with memory problems.
      • eg: as people age they experience memory loss. But research has shown this seems to be specific to episodic memory- it becomes harder to recall memories of personal experiences that occurred relatively recently through past episodic memories remain intact.
    • continued
      • Belleville devised an intervention to improve episodic memory in older people. Trained participants performed better on test of episodic memory after training than a control group.
      • shows that distinguishing between different types of LTM enables specific treatments to be developed.
    See similar decks