2.3-2.4

    Cards (60)

    • Correlation
      A relationship between two or more variables, but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect
    • Correlation coefficient
      A number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between variables
    • Positive correlation

      Variables move in the same direction
    • Negative correlation
      Variables move in opposite directions
    • Correlation does not indicate causation
    • Confounding variable
      A variable that is actually causing the systematic movement in the variables of interest
    • Correlational research is limited because it cannot establish cause and effect
    • Illusory correlation

      False correlations where people believe relationships exist between two things when no such relationship exists
    • Confirmation bias is looking for evidence to support a hunch and ignoring evidence that would tell us the hunch is false
    • Illusory correlations can lead to prejudicial attitudes and discriminatory behaviour
    • Experiments are needed to establish cause and effect relationships between variables
    • Illusory correlations are beliefs about relationships between variables that do not actually exist
    • Confirmation bias is the tendency to look for and interpret information in a way that confirms our existing beliefs
    • Illusory correlations can lead to prejudicial attitudes and discriminatory behavior
    • Experiment (in scientific context)
      A study with precise requirements for design and implementation, not just trying something new
    • Hypothesis
      A specific prediction about the relationship between variables that can be tested
    • Conducting an experiment
      1. Formulate hypothesis
      2. Design experiment with experimental and control groups
      3. Operationalize variables
      4. Implement experiment
      5. Analyze results
    • Experimental group
      The group that receives the experimental manipulation
    • Control group
      The group that does not receive the experimental manipulation
    • Operational definition

      A precise description of how variables are measured
    • Experimenter bias
      The possibility that a researcher's expectations might skew the results of the study
    • Single-blind study

      Participants are unaware of which group they are in, but researchers know
    • Double-blind study

      Neither participants nor researchers know which group individuals are in
    • Placebo effect
      When people's expectations or beliefs influence their experience in a given situation
    • Independent variable

      The variable manipulated or controlled by the experimenter
    • Dependent variable
      The variable measured to see the effect of the independent variable
    • Participants
      The subjects of psychological research
    • Random sample
      A subset of a larger population where every member has an equal chance of being selected
    • Random assignment
      Participants are randomly assigned to experimental or control groups
    • Quasi-experimental research cannot make cause-and-effect claims because the independent variable cannot be directly manipulated
    • Ethical constraints limit the types of experiments researchers can conduct
    • Statistical analysis
      Determines how likely any differences between groups are due to chance
    • Researchers cannot directly control a person's sex when looking for differences between males and females on a task that taps into spatial memory
    • Quasi-experimental research

      Research approach where the researcher cannot directly control the independent variable
    • In quasi-experimental research, researchers cannot make cause-and-effect claims
    • Researchers are limited by ethical constraints, such as not being able to conduct an experiment designed to determine if experiencing abuse as a child leads to lower levels of self-esteem among adults
    • Statistical analysis
      Conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the experimental and control groups
    • Psychologists consider differences to be statistically significant if there is less than a 5% chance of observing them if the groups did not actually differ from one another
    • Experiments
      • Greatest strength is the ability to assert that any significant differences in the findings are caused by the independent variable
      • Random selection, random assignment, and a design that limits the effects of both experimenter bias and participant expectancy should create groups that are similar in composition and treatment
    • If an experiment finds that watching a violent television program results in more violent behavior than watching a nonviolent program, researchers can safely say that watching violent television programs causes an increase in the display of violent behavior