Judges might take extraordinary measures to protect the core principles of the constitution if parliament fails to do so
Theoreticalunderpinning
The role of the judiciary is to be responsible for upholding the law, justice, rights and democracy
Lord Templeman
"If the argument that government ministers should be immune from prosecution for breaching a court order were accepted, it would establish the idea that the executive branch follows the law out of choice and not obligation"
Unison case 2017 ( Lord Reed)
'Without such access, laws are liable to become a dead letter'
If people don't have access to justice, laws cant be enforced
The work done by parliament may be rendered nugatory (meaningless) if people can't access justice
Constitutional Reform Act 2005
Created Judicial Appointments Commission
Reformed the position of the Lord Chancellor
The head of the judiciary is the Lord Chief Justice
Judicial Appointments Commission is an independent body now in charge of appointing judges
Crown Proceedings Act 1947 s2
Establishes immunity
Judges are immune from being sued
What was the supreme court known as before 2005?
House of Lords
Judges in the supreme court no longer have connections with Parliament