A conceptual framework for organizing knowledge and providing a blueprint for action
History
Understanding the historical context of management provides a sense of heritage and can help managers avoid the mistakes of others
The Egyptians used management functions of planning, organizing, and controlling when they constructed the pyramids
Figure 2.1 illustrates a few of the most important management breakthroughs and practices over the last 4000 years
Classical Management Perspective
Ideas of the early 20th century theorists and managers converged with the emergence and evolution of large-scale business and management practice
Viewpoints within the Classical Management Perspective
Scientific management
Administrative management
Scientific Management
Concerned with improving the performance of individual workers
Frederick Taylor developed this system, which he believed would lead to a more efficient and productive work force
Steps in Scientific Management
1. Develop a science for each element of the job
2. Scientifically select employees and then train them to do the job
3. Supervise employees to make sure they follow prescribed methods
4. Continue to plan the work, but use workers to get the work done
Administrative Management
Deals with managing the total organization
Laid the foundation for later development in management theory
More appropriate for stable and simple organizations than for today's dynamic and complex organizations
Table 2.1 provides more details on Administrative Management
Behavioral Management Perspective
Placed more emphasis on individual attitudes and behaviors and on group processes and recognized the importance of behavioral processes in the work place
Human Relations Movement
Proposed that workers respond primarily to the social context of the workplace, including social conditioning, group norms, and interpersonal dynamics
Organizational Behavior
The field that draws from a broad, interdisciplinary base of psychology, sociology, anthropology, economics, and medicine to study human behavior in organizations
Theory X
Assumptions: Employees dislike work, are irresponsible, lack ambition, and resist change
Theory Y
Assumptions: Employees are willing to work, self-directed, accept responsibility, creative, and self-controlled
Management Science
Focuses specifically on the development of mathematical models
Quantitative Management
Applies quantitative techniques to management
Table 2.4 provides more details on Management Science vs Quantitative Management
Systems Perspective of Organizations
Inputs from the environment: material, human, financial, and information
Transformation Process: technology, operating systems, administrative systems, and control systems
Outputs into the environment: products/services, profits/losses, employee behaviors, and information outputs
Feedback
Synergy
Two or more subsystems working together may often be more successful then working alone
Entropy
A normal process leading to system decline
Universal perspective
Tempting to identify one best way
Contingency perspective
Depending on elements in that situation
Management Perspectives
Classical Management
Behavioral Management
Quantitative Management
Contingency Perspective
Recognition of the situational nature of management. Response to particular characteristics of situation
Systems Approach
Recognition of internal interdependencies. Recognition of environmental influences
System
An interrelated set of elements functioning as a whole
Types of Systems
Open System: an organizational system that interacts with its environment
Closed System: an organizational system that does not interact with its environment
Subsystem: a system within a broader system
Operations Management
Techniques generally concerned with helping the organization produce products or services more efficiently
A complete understanding of management requires an appreciation of classical, behavioral, and quantitative approaches
The systems and contingency perspectives can help managers integrate the three approaches and enlarge understanding of all three
Figure 2.5 shows the emergence of modern management perspectives