Teleology stems from the Greek word "Telos" meaning 'end' or 'purpose'. It is an argument for the existence of God to suggest that there is order or purpose to the world. End results. The teleological argument is also known as the design argument. It is based on observation of the apparent orderm design and purpose. Goldilocks earth -> how the earth is just right.
An inductive argument is seen as supplying strong evidence for the truth of its conclusion
An observational argument is evidence gained from observing the world
St. Thomas Aquinas:
Wrote about the Teleological in his Five Ways "Quinque Viae"
Aristotle had just been rediscovered by Europeans, and Aquinas was a key thinker who thought it was necessary to find out if Christian thought and Aristotle could link together
Key goal was to show how faith and reason could work alongside each other
He believed God could be reached in 2 ways, either revelation or human reason
If we applied reason to the world around us, we can reveal truths
Aquinas' Teleological (design) argument:
Out of his Five ways, the 5th way was the teleological argument
Nature has order and purpose, yet, it might not even have a mind
A river knows to flow to the sea, yet it doesn't know it has this purpose as it doesn't have a mind
Shown with his archer analogy 🏹: an arrow hitting a target has the purpose of hitting the taget, however, it is the archer that pushes the arrow for its purpose
The Archer is God
William Paley:
During the 1700s and 1800s, science was expanding
Shows how animals and plants are designed for certain areas
William Paley was the Archdeacon of Carlisle
Natural Theology (1802) he produced his teleological argument
the Pocket Watch Analogy 🕰️: Walking in a heath, if you see a rock, you think nothing of it, however, if you come across a pocket watch in the heath, you would look upon its intricate and precise parts an know it was designed. Think of the pocketwatch as the world, our world is so precise that it too must be designed by God
Although both believe in the Teleological argument, Aquinas believes in the argument to design, whereas Paley believes in the argument from design.
David Hume:
Scottish philosopher -> sceptic
challenged and questioned beliefs
Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
-> Cleanthes is for the design argument
-> Demea is for the cosmological argument
-> Philio argues against both arguments
23 years before Paley's well-known analogy
Humes 1st Teleological criticism:
a world with a 'great' design, means there must be a 'great' designer
Hume argues that this implies an Anthropomorphic concept of God which is inconsistent with the notion of perfection
the world argues that due to the world being imperfect, there must be an incompetent designer
the world is imperfect and finite, suggesting it was not made by an all-perfect God
Humes 2nd Teleological criticism:
order is necessary part of the world's existence
world looks designed, as if the world was chaotic, we couldn't survive
impossible to show that God created order, could come from chance
Hume believed that there wasn't a design, it is a series adaptations from animals that make the world look ordered ->> 80 years before Darwins natural selection theory
Humes 3rd Teleological criticism:
organic and mechanical
comparing the world to machines doesn't make sense
universe's apparent purpose is rather more internal and organic than external and mechanical
Hume's scale analogy: it is used to show that we know the affect but not the cause of something
John Stuart Mill:
Utilitarianism
Nature and the Utility of Religion
He said ~> 'nature is guilty of serious crimes which she goes unpunished'
If there is a designer then he is cruel and incompetent due to the atrocities that humans and animals go through cause of natural disasters
Darwinist Challenges to the Teleological argument:
evolution and adaptation
Theory of Natural Selection
those with the best characteristics survive and reproduce
Darwin couldn't believe that a God designed the world as the Ichneumonidae lay their larva into the living caterpillar which has been paralysed but is left alive
Richard Dawkins criticism of the Teleological argument:
he is a biologist, who supports Darwin by arguing that random mutations in DNA give rise to variation in the world ~~>illusion of design
selfish genes survive, DNA and the universe doesn't care about people -> just survival
Male birds show natural selection well ->> male birds like peacocks are usually brightlycoloured as it allows them to attract females, although it makes them obvious to predators
If a God did design, to Dawkins it seems there would have been multipledeities as seen with a cheetah and gazelle
Swinburne and the Fine Tuning argument:
Swinburne argues that science can't give a satisfactory answer
Science assumes the laws of nature
It can’t say where they come from or why they are the way they are, because all scientific explanations presuppose laws
Swinburne believes that the most probable answer is most likely to be correct
The more evidence, the more likely that the universe was designed