Does utilitarianism provide a helpful method of moral decision-making:
doesn't require religious belief of a particular kind
reasonable to understand
reasonable processes to solve moral problems
common moral currency
relies on future predictions doesn't think about the minority
Can an ethical judgement about something being good, bad, right or wrong be based on the extent to which in any given situation utility is best served:
serving utility
rules could face dilemmas
could allow evil = slave trade
justifying horrendous acts for the pleasure of the many -> sadistic guards
justice, fairness, equality also matter
Is it possible to measure good or pleasure and then reach a moral decision:
different pleasures + goods
MacIntyre --> suspicious of using notions of happiness can't be confident for future predictions
Utilitarianism presumes too much foreknowledge perhaps