children's thinking changes as they age, emphasising that children do not think about the world the same way adults do, suggesting that cognitive development is a systematic, structured process
Sensori-motor
1. 0-2 years
2. Understanding of environment by using senses/actions
3. Skill: object permanence, stranger anxiety
Pre-operational
1. 2-7 years
2. Child starts to use symbols, e.g words/pictures, to represent objects
3. Can classify objects by 1 feature
4. Skill: pretend play, egocentric thinking
Concrete operational
1. 7-11 years
2. Able to reason logically with concrete events
3. Can see things from the point of view of others
4. Can classify objects through several features
5. Skill: conversation, simple understanding of maths, geometry, physics, etc
Formal operational
1. 11+ years
2. Can understand and reason logically about abstract concepts
3. Can create and test hypotheses
4. Skill: moral reasoning
schema
developed based on info provided by life experiences, stored in memory, able to predict and apply to new experiences
piaget practical applications
impacted the field of education, the concept of 'readiness' provided a useful framework for the national curriculum, what age certain concepts should be taught, e.g concreate operational stage is primary school
student centred learning
piaget also acknowledged nurture, teachers should facilitate learning rather than direct tuition, using collaborative/peer support so children can learn from each other
vygotsky's theory of social development
suggests that development is a continuous process, and all infants are born with basic cognitive abilities (still acknowledges nature) but require social interaction is needed to develop this (nurture)
more knowledgeable other
anyone who has a better or higher understanding/ability level than the child/learner, e.g teacher, parents, peers
zone of proximal development
the range of tasks that a child can perform with help and guidance from MKO but cannot perform independently, most learning occurs in this zone
vygotsky practical applications
supports the use of collaborative learning, suggesting that group members should have different levels of ability so more advanced peers can help the less advanced
scaffolding
teacher structures task so it is achievable, when the learner becomes more skilled, the teacher gradually reduces levels of support, wood et al's study links to this