Only measure the ability to take intelligence tests, not meaningful
Intelligence research is one of the most rigorous areas in psychology and intelligence tests are some of the most scrutinised and validated in psychology. These tests are tapping into something, even if there is debate into the structure of intelligence
Intelligence tests are biased against X type of people
Largely false: A huge amount of work has gone into creating culturally neutral measures of intelligence, although previous exposure to intelligence tests could influence some results
The idea of "intelligence" is meaningless because there are lots of different types of intelligence
Partially false/debatable: Although there are different facets of intelligence, they tend to correlate pretty strongly with each other, suggesting a higher factor (g) or factors Gf, Gc, etc
Intelligence
Genetically determined or largely influenced by the environment?
Increasing intelligence
Through enriching childhood environment? Can we increase intelligence in adulthood?
Sex differences in intelligence
Overall intelligence? Specific facets of intelligence?
Differences in intelligence across human populations
Are there differences across populations? Are these environmental or genetic?
Intelligence linked to many life outcomes such as mortality, crime and poverty
Correlation is not causation: these relationships could be bidirectional or caused by other variables (e.g. poverty might lead to lower intelligence from low nutrition and education, and might also be linked to crime)
Intelligence
Capacity to judge, reason and comprehend well (Binet 1916)
Capacity to form concepts and grasp significance (Terman 1916)
Ability of an individual to adapt well to new situations in life (Pintner 1921)
Capacity to inhibit instinctive response, imagine a different response, and realise the response modification into behaviour (Thurstone 1921)
Ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience (Gottfredson 1997)
Galton
Began to study heredity of intelligence (Darwinʼs cousin)
One of the first to try and study individual differences in intelligence
Higher intelligence seemed to run in families. Suggested children inherit intelligence from parents
Studied The Times obituaries
Number of eminent relatives was higher in 1st than 2nd, higher in 2nd than 3rd
Issue of causation...intelligence running in families or effects of class?
Suggested looking at twins and adoptions...laid the framework for future studies into nature and nurture
AlfredBinet
Designed first widely used intelligence test (Binet-Simon)
Aimed to identify children that were falling behind
Binet believed that IQ could be increased by education
Used the tests to categorise people in school and in the armed services
Physical Tasks
Memory Tasks
Comprehension and Judgment Tasks
Reasoning Tasks
Verbal Tasks
Louis Terman
Collected normative data on a large sample of American children to recalibrate the test scores
Provided a more reliable standardisation, allowing the test to better reflect the abilities of American children
Extended the age range of the test to include adults
Stanford-Binet1916
Added 40 new items
More comprehensive: larger number of items, addition of many non-verbal items
Tested: Verbal Reasoning, Abstract/Visual Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning, Short-term Memory, General Knowledge and Comprehension
RobertYerkes
Contribution of psychology to the war effort (World War I)
Assessing recruits to determine how they might be best used
Stanford-Binet too detailed and resource intensive/ Needed a way to do group administration rather than 1 on 1 testing
Army Test: Alpha Test, Beta Test
RavenʼsProgressive Matrices
Aim is to "test a persons ability to form perceptual relations and to reason by analogy"
Weschler Tests
Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) for ages 16-75 was first developed in 1939 and still existed today (has been continually updated)
Wechsler Scale for Children (WISC) for children between 5 and 16 years
New method for calculating IQ for adults that was not dependent on "mental age"
Charles Spearmanʼs G
Noticed correlations between different measures of intelligence
Positive manifold refers to the fact that scores on cognitive assessment tend to correlate very highly with each other, indicating a common latent dimension that is very strong
Developed the concept of g (general intelligence) which underpinned why specific abilities (e.g. mathematical, verbal, spatial reasoning) tend to correlate
His model is a two factor model: g and specific abilities
Cattell and Gf/Gc Theory
Gf = fluid intelligence: Fluid intelligence refers to the capacity to reason quickly and think abstractly
Gc = crystallised intelligence: Crystallised intelligence is the ability to use skills, knowledge, and experience
Gf typically peaks in 20s and begins a slow decline, Gc tends to peak later
Cattell, Carroll, Horn (CHC) Theory
Combines Carrols three level model, with additional broad and narrow abilities identified by Cattell and Horns extendedGf Gc Theory