Rolling resistance from the road surface-tire interface
Grade or gravitational resistance
Both tractive effort and resistance are measured in newton (N)
Diagram showing forces acting on a road vehicle (After Mannering et al. 2009)
Basic equation of vehicle motion
Equation describing the motion of a vehicle considering tractive effort and resistance
Aerodynamic resistance
Significant impact on vehicle performance
Concerns over fuel efficiency lead to efficient aerodynamic designs
Turbulent air flow around the vehicle body is the primary source (over 85%)
Equation for determining aerodynamic resistance
Specific equation provided to calculate aerodynamic resistance
Power required to overcome aerodynamic resistance
Calculation of power required to overcome aerodynamic resistance
Effect of operational factors on the drag coefficient of an automobile
Analysis of operational factors affecting the drag coefficient
Rolling resistance
Resistance generated from internal mechanical friction and tire-roadway interaction
Tire deformation is a primary source
Penetration of the tire into the surface and corresponding surface compression also contribute
Sources of rolling resistance
Tire deformation as it passes over the pavement surface (90% of total)
Penetration of the tire into the surface and surface compression (4%)
Frictional motion and air circulation around the tire (6%)
Factors controlling rolling resistance
Rigidity of tire and pavement surface
Tire conditions including inflation pressure and temperature
Vehicle's operating speed affects tire deformation and rolling resistance
Evaluation of rolling resistance
Coefficient of rolling resistance (frl) approximated as: frl = 0.01 + 0.0095 (V)
Rolling resistance (Rrl) calculated based on vehicle speed
Power required to overcome rolling resistance (Prl) in watts: Prl = frl * W * V
Grade resistance
Component of vehicle weight parallel to the pavement surface: Rg = W sin(θ)
For small highway grades: sin(θ) ≈ θ
Grade G = vertical rise / horizontal distance
Available tractive effort - Maximum tractive effort
Excess force results in spinning tires without overcoming resistance or accelerating
Rear-wheel-drive vehicles: TEmax = μ (Wr + hP/b)
Front-wheel-drive vehicles: TEmax = μ (Wf - hP/b)
Fuel efficiency - Critical determinants
Engine design improving air and fuel delivery and reducing friction enhances efficiency
Resistance-reducing measures like lowering vehicle weight, improving aerodynamics, and optimizing tire designs
Principles of braking: Braking forces
Braking characteristics are crucial for vehicle performance
Typical values of coefficients of road adhesion
Braking forces
Maximum braking forces develop at the impending slide point
Locked wheels result in reduced braking efficiency
Antilock systems prevent wheel lock and optimize braking forces
Principles of braking: Braking force ratio
Maximum deceleration achieved by distributing braking forces proportionally between front and rear brakes
Braking force ratio determined by the ratio of maximum braking forces on front and rear axles
Principles of braking: Proportional allocation of braking force
Proportional allocation of braking force to front (PBFf) and rear (PBFr) axles for optimal braking
Principles of braking: Braking efficiency
Optimal braking force proportioning varies with vehicle and road conditions
Front-wheel lockup preferable to rear-wheel lockup to avoid uncontrollable spins
Braking efficiency term reflects deviation from optimal braking force proportioning
Principles of braking: Antilock braking systems
Antilock braking systems prevent wheel lock and maintain high braking efficiency
Aim to keep the coefficient of road adhesion from dropping to slide values
Principles of braking: Theoretical stopping distance
Calculation of minimum stopping distances
Principles of braking: Practical stopping distance
Ensuring adequate driver sight distance for safe stopping
Consideration of various driver skill levels, vehicle types, and weather conditions in highway design
Principles of braking: Equation for practical stopping distance
AASHTO (2004) recommended deceleration rate of 3.4 m/s²
Principles of braking: Distance travelled during driver perception/reaction
Importance of considering perception/reaction distance in sight distance provision
Perception/reaction time influenced by age, physical condition, emotional state, and situation complexity
Principles of braking: Conservative perception/reaction time for highway design
2.5 seconds
Average driver perception/reaction times: 1.0 to 1.5 seconds
Principles of braking: Total required stopping distance
Summary of the required stopping distance considerations
Highway alignment
The position or the layout of the centre of the highway on the ground
Types of highway alignment
Horizontal alignment: Straight path, horizontal deviations and curves
Vertical alignment: Changes in gradient and vertical curves
Disadvantages of improper alignment
Increase in construction cost
Increase in maintenance cost
Increase in vehicle operation cost
Increase in accident rate
Once the highway is aligned and constructed, it is not easy to change the alignment due to increase in cost of adjoining land and construction of costly structures by the highway side
Basic requirements of an ideal alignment between two terminal stations
Short: a straight alignment is the shortest
Easy: for construction and maintenance of roads with minimum problems
Safe: for construction and maintenance of roads from the view point of stability of natural hill slopes, embankment and cut slopes and foundation of embankments; also for traffic operation with safe geometric features
Economical: the lowest total cost including initial cost, maintenance cost and vehicle operation cost. The alignment would offer maximum utility by serving maximum population and products
Factors controlling alignment
Obligatory points
Traffic
Geometric design
Economics
Other considerations
Obligatory points: Points through which the alignment has to pass
Straight alignment AB is deviated along the hill side pass, thus avoiding a tunnel or heavy cutting
The bridge should be located only at place where the river has straight and permanent path and where the bridge abutment and pier can be properly founded
Obligatory points: Points through which the alignment should not pass
Costly structures
Religious places (churches, temples, mosques, grave or tomb
Unsuitable land (marshy, peaty, and water logged areas
Lake or pond
Origin and Destination study
Carried out in the area and the desired lines be drawn showing the trend of traffic flow