This is a different gender education gap, and is repeated in university entries, and would suggest that rather than boys catching up with girls post-16, more underachieving boys are taken out of these statistics altogether and are taking other qualifications instead, such as apprenticeships
The gap is also present in pre-school with a Save the Children study in 2016 suggesting that boys are nearly twice as likely as girls to fall behind before school even begins
In the 1960s, boys were much more likely to be entered for O Levels at all, although girls did start outperforming boys in the subjects they did take from the late 60s
In the 1950s and 1960s, many people believed that the reason why boys outperformed girls at school were biological: boys' brains were better designed for rational thought and girls were too emotional to perform very well in education
There is plenty of biological and psychological evidence now to show that such explanations were nonsense, and of course the consistent way girls outperform boys in education makes that point very clearly
Although there has not been a complete change-there is still a gender pay gap, women still do more housework than men, women are still more likely to stop work or go part-time to bring up children-most girls do now expect to work and there are of course many female role models who have gained very good qualifications and gone on to perform important roles
Greater equality for women in society has made educational achievement more worthwhile for girls and there has been a corresponding boost in girls' achievement
By the 90s, Sharpe found that there had been a "gender quake". Girls' priorities had more-or-less reversed. Career came before love or marriage. These girls were more confident, more ambitious, committed to gender equality and were more assertive too
The reasons for the change in attitudes are put down, at least in part, to changes in the law that were occurring when the first research was conducted
New Right sociologists, like Charles Murray, suggest that the presence of welfare benefits has led to boys being happy to leave school without qualifications, with no aspirations beyond being unemployed
Reasons suggested by sociologists for why girls used to underperform in school
Teachers' low expectations of girls
Resources such as textbooks and reading schemes reinforcing gender stereotypes
Boys' dominance of the classroom and monopolising the teachers' attention
School encouraging deference and passivity from girls (and assertiveness and competitiveness from boys)
Girls being concerned that intelligence was an unattractive characteristic from the perspective of boys (intelligence not being seen as a feminine trait)
School careers guidance pushing girls towards low-paid or domestic roles
Gender division of subjects reinforcing gender stereotypes (such as girls studying home economic while the boys do metalwork)
The new gender gap in educational achievement is not due to boys performing less well than they did in the past, it is because girls have improved faster than boys have (at least in terms of examination results)
The predominance of female teachers in the profession<|>Aspects of education, for example reading, are associated with a female role because mothers and (female) teachers are (predominantly) the people who read to children<|>Educational achievement is increasingly measured against skills where girls excel more than boys, and this point was made particularly about the high levels of coursework in GCSE and, later, A Level
GIST stands for Girls Into Science and Technology and was a project in the early 1980s to try and address gender differences in subject choice and encourage more girls to choose sciences at school
The arrival of the National Curriculum means that all students must study the sciences, for example, so the sorts of gender divisions into gendered subjects happens much less and much later in education today
The introduction of school performance league tables might have led to schools focusing on improving girls' achievement as it was previously risking bringing down their position in the league table
The majority of interactions between teachers and girls are educational, many of the interactions between teachers and boys are more about discipline or crowd control