evaluation mad up of feelings, beliefs and behaviours towards a person place or event
explicit attitudes
conscious judgement held towards an attitude object
implicit attitudes

unconscious judgements held towards an attitude object
tripartite model of attitudes
Festinger theory of cognitive dissonance: people will try to reduce the dissonance between their beliefs and their behaviours
cognitive dissonance - a feeling of mental disdcomfort when contradictory information is percived
effects of cognitive dissonance on behaviour
avoidance - avoid situations where cognitive dissonance may occur
reduction - people seek to reduce cognitive dissonance so their life is balanced
rationalisation - when experiencing cognitive dissonance people justify their behaviour
cognitive dissonancce
Attribution

process of attaching meaning to a behaviour or the behaviour of others to help make sence of the world
dispositional attribution- assigning cause of behaviour internally
situational attribution- assigning causes of behaviour externally
self serving bias blaming your wrong on situationally, and other peoples wrongs on dispositional
social norm

unwritten rules of beliefs attitudes and behaviours that are considered acceptable in a social group
social identity 

sence of self in terms of group membership. positive self identiy allows for positive self esteem
social identity theory Tadjfel and Turner
groups that people belong to are an important source of pride and self esteem
stereotyping is based off normal cognitive process
ingroup - group an individual associates with

out group - any group an individual doesn't associate with
social identity theory

proposes that all members of an ingroup will steryotypemembers of an outgroup by assuming all members of the outgroup are similar and find ways to show them in poor light to boost their own self esteem
3 cognitive stages of determining out group vs in group
Social categorisation -categorising people into groups based off characteristics
social identification - adopt the identity of the group they categorise themselves into
social comparison - comparing the joined group to other groups
strengths - explains sympathy towards ingroups vs out groups & bias between in and out groups

limitations - intergroup conflict for competition
stereotypes - oversimplified belief about an outgroup leading to either positive of negative thoughts about its memebers
cognitive schemata used to quickly and simply process large amounts of information
causes of stereotypes
media
influence from others
social communication - second hand information
prejudice - negative feeling held towards members of an outgroup
discrimination - unjustified negative actions towards members of an outgroup
direct discrimintaiton - intentional, individual is treated unfairly bcause of their characteristics
indirect discrimintation - unintentional, individuals with a specific characteristic are unfairly disadvantages
just world phenomenon - karma. assumption that everything happens for a reason and the world is just fair
intergroup contact - interactions between memebers of different gorups
contact hypothesis - intergroup contact can reduce prejudice and negative stereotypes held against members
superordinate goals - goals both groups want to achieve but need cooperation from both groups
robbert cave experiment
2 groups were kept separate, team bonding
when aware of each other hostility arouse
series of competitive activities
cooling off period where had to list similar features between the groups and boys tended to characterise their own group in more positive ways and the other group in negative
festinger and Carlsmith
to investigate whether making people perform a dull task would create cognitive dissonance through forced compliance
those bribed $1 rated the tasks as more fun/enjoyable than those bribed $20
small amount of money wasn't enough to lie so they changed their belief
no informed consent and poor validity bc tasks don't occur in everyday life
independent variable - variable that you change

dependent variable - what you measure
qualitative data - not numbers
self concept
A collection of beliefs, ideas and feelings about one’s own identity
magnitude as a factor affecting cognitive dissonance

magnitude is a subjective measure of the level of discomfort an individual feels when experiencing cognitive dissonance
greater the magnitude of dissonance the greater the preassure to reduce dissonance
2 factors affecting magnitude of discomfort - more value placed on the situation providing dissonance, maximum level of dissonance an individual can manage before needing to reduce discomfort