What is the myth of Parentocracy?Who is the key theorist?· Marketisationlegitimatesinequalityby making it look as if all parents areequally free to choose a good school·Ball:parentalchoice + marketisation policiesreproduce social class inequalitiesin education (rather than improving standards).
What is the first argument that shows the myth of parentocracy?· MC havehigh levels of income, education, social + cultural capital+ soknow more about how to work the systemto get the schools they want = they are in a better position to:oUnderstand + compare schoolsin the league tables/use Ofsted school inspection reports + know what constitutes as a‘good school’o Afford more easily tomove into the catchment areasof the highest performing schools
Other arguments?· Weaker students from WC backgrounds aren’t selected by the best schools because of therisk of them getting poor results + undermining the school's position in the league tables.· Popular schools will bebetter fundede.g. –will get better facilities + so further improve their standardswhereas less successful schoolslose income + so can’t improve their standards to match their more successful rivals, the opposite of improved standards marketisation was intended to achieve.
What is the argument for globalization?Who is the theorist?· It argued that, in order to successfully compete in the global market, theUK needs a skilled + well qualified workforce.·Kelly:British educational policy has becomeincreasingly geared to the global economic competitiveness -e.g. – changes in the curriculum werejustified on this basis
Further explanation for this argument?· Free school policy wasinfluenced by similar types of schools in other countries; Universities + public schools increasinglymarket themselves to a global audience, with some even setting up overseas‘branches’ in other countries + more and more English students studying abroad for reasons of cost.
Evaluation to this argument?However, the above policies are the result ofmarketisation, which treats education like abusiness, rather than human right+ students as sources of profit, thus underminingequality of opportunity.