The Bottom-up Approach is the British approach developed by David Canter
The Bottom-up approach is where profilers work up from the evidence collected from crime scene to develop a hypothesis about the likely characteristics/motivations/social background of the offender
Investigative psychology is a form of the bottom-up approach where details from the crime scene are matched with statistical analysis of typical offender behaviour patterns based on psychological theory
Interpersonal Coherence is where an offender's behaviour at the crime scene may reflect their everyday behaviour
Forensic Awareness is where individuals who have been subject to previous police interrogation may reflect this in their behaviour/techniques
Investigative psychology has validity from research support e.g. Canter & Heritage
Canter & Heritage conducted small-space analysis on 66 sexual assault cases and identified several behaviours common in different samples of behaviour e.g. impersonal language
A limitation of investigative psychology is that the database only consists of solved crimes so may only reflect more straightforward cases
Geographical Profiling is a form of the bottom-up approach based on the principle of spacial consistency and uses crime mapping to make inferences about the home/operational base of the offender
Geographical Profiling is based off of Canter's circle theory
The Marauder operates in close proximity to their home base
The Commuter likely travels a distance from their usual residence
There is research to support geographical profiling e.g. Canter & Lundrigan
Canter & Lundrigan used small-space analysis on 120 murder cases which revealed spacial consistency and a 'centre of gravity' in the circle of body disposal sites
Geographical Profiling may not be sufficient on its own as recording of crime is not always accurate (estimated 75% of crimes not reported)
The Bottom-up Approach is more reliable as it uses data and evidence, unlike interviews and self-reports in the Top-down Approach
The Bottom-up Approach is more reliable as it uses data and evidence, unlike interviews and self-reports in the Top-down Approach